Re: [kde] Cute, you don't like my message, so I'm bounced as not subscribed

2012-11-16 Thread Bob Williams
On 15/11/12 21:32, Duncan wrote: Which leaves a very limited set of possibilities. The only two I know of that make sense at all, are that the database was temporarily unavailable the first time (maybe taken offline for a backup), then brought back into service, but the listserv itself

Re: [kde] passive, non-intrusive progress bar?

2012-11-16 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Saturday, 2012-11-10, adrelanos wrote: If you have the option of implementing your solution in a scripting language with D-Bus support, then it should be possible to access that part of the desktop directly. The D-Bus name for the service is org.kde.JobViewServer, but I am not

Re: [kde] Cute, you don't like my message, so I'm bounced as not subscribed

2012-11-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 16 November 2012 16:07:45 Bob Williams did opine: On 15/11/12 21:32, Duncan wrote: Which leaves a very limited set of possibilities. The only two I know of that make sense at all, are that the database was temporarily unavailable the first time (maybe taken offline for a

Re: [kde] Cute, you don't like my message, so I'm bounced as not subscribed

2012-11-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 16 November 2012 16:09:00 Chuck Burns did opine: On 11/16/2012 11:33 AM, Bob Williams wrote: On 15/11/12 21:32, Duncan wrote: Which leaves a very limited set of possibilities. The only two I know of that make sense at all, are that the database was temporarily unavailable the

Re: [kde] Cute, you don't like my message, so I'm bounced as not subscribed

2012-11-16 Thread Bob Williams
On 16/11/12 21:09, Gene Heskett wrote: On Friday 16 November 2012 16:09:00 Chuck Burns did opine: On 11/16/2012 11:33 AM, Bob Williams wrote: On 15/11/12 21:32, Duncan wrote: Which leaves a very limited set of possibilities. The only two I know of that make sense at all, are that the

Re: [kde] Cute, you don't like my message, so I'm bounced as not subscribed

2012-11-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 16 November 2012 18:03:13 Bob Williams did opine: On 16/11/12 21:09, Gene Heskett wrote: On Friday 16 November 2012 16:09:00 Chuck Burns did opine: On 11/16/2012 11:33 AM, Bob Williams wrote: On 15/11/12 21:32, Duncan wrote: Which leaves a very limited set of possibilities.