Re: [kde] Cute, you don't like my message, so I'm bounced as not subscribed

2012-11-17 Thread Anne Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 16/11/2012 22:34, Bob Williams wrote: On 16/11/12 21:09, Gene Heskett wrote: On Friday 16 November 2012 16:09:00 Chuck Burns did opine: On 11/16/2012 11:33 AM, Bob Williams wrote: On 15/11/12 21:32, Duncan wrote: Which leaves a very limited

Re: [kde] Has the KDE Social/Semantic Desktop been worth the hassle to anyone?

2012-11-17 Thread Anne Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17/11/2012 09:16, Rafa Griman wrote: Well Duncan, I agree with you in that there are two types of people, that I _don't_ like the semantic desktop and I'm also a Gentoo user (and Archer). But, IMHO, the devs could have made it possible to

Re: [kde] Cute, you don't like my message, so I'm bounced as not subscribed

2012-11-17 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 17 November 2012 06:58:18 Anne Wilson did opine: On 16/11/2012 22:34, Bob Williams wrote: On 16/11/12 21:09, Gene Heskett wrote: On Friday 16 November 2012 16:09:00 Chuck Burns did opine: On 11/16/2012 11:33 AM, Bob Williams wrote: On 15/11/12 21:32, Duncan wrote: Which

Re: [kde] Has the KDE Social/Semantic Desktop been worth the hassle to anyone?

2012-11-17 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 17 November 2012 07:00:27 Anne Wilson did opine: On 17/11/2012 09:16, Rafa Griman wrote: Well Duncan, I agree with you in that there are two types of people, that I _don't_ like the semantic desktop and I'm also a Gentoo user (and Archer). But, IMHO, the devs could have made it

Re: [kde] Cute, you don't like my message, so I'm bounced as not subscribed

2012-11-17 Thread Bob Williams
On 17/11/12 11:54, Bob Williams wrote: On 17/11/12 10:34, Anne Wilson wrote: On 16/11/2012 22:34, Bob Williams wrote: [...] Well, actually, it didn't, because I never saw my post. In fact I thought it had not got through until I saw your reply to my post. I think there's something not

Re: [kde] Cute, you don't like my message, so I'm bounced as not subscribed

2012-11-17 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 17 November 2012 08:12:11 Bob Williams did opine: On 17/11/12 11:54, Bob Williams wrote: On 17/11/12 10:34, Anne Wilson wrote: On 16/11/2012 22:34, Bob Williams wrote: [...] Well, actually, it didn't, because I never saw my post. In fact I thought it had not got through

Re: [kde] Has the KDE Social/Semantic Desktop been worth the hassle to anyone?

2012-11-17 Thread Jerome Yuzyk
On Friday, November 16, 2012 11:33:04 PM Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Jerome Yuzyk posted on Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:23:50 -0700 as excerpted: So what's happening with this grand vision? My honest opinion? In general, it's a tool for those that really aren't comfortable with

Re: [kde] Has the KDE Social/Semantic Desktop been worth the hassle to anyone?

2012-11-17 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Saturday, 2012-11-17, Jerome Yuzyk wrote: With all the hassles added by Akonadi and Nepomuk and Strigi for some higher social/semantic desktop purpose, does anyone actually _use_ the stuff? Ok, this is basically the second part of [1] Similar to how Strigi is tasked with providing meta

Re: [kde] Has the KDE Social/Semantic Desktop been worth the hassle to anyone?

2012-11-17 Thread Rafa Griman
Hi :) On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17/11/2012 09:16, Rafa Griman wrote: Well Duncan, I agree with you in that there are two types of people, that I _don't_ like the semantic desktop and I'm

Re: [kde] Has the KDE Social/Semantic Desktop been worth the hassle to anyone?

2012-11-17 Thread Duncan
Martin Bednar posted on Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:13:58 +0100 as excerpted: Le samedi 17 novembre 2012 16:30:05 Duncan a écrit : Kevin Krammer posted on Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:29:22 +0100 as excerpted: On Saturday, 2012-11-17, Jerome Yuzyk wrote: With all the hassles added by Akonadi and Nepomuk and