Kevin Krammer
Weird, I seem to have backed up my email and browser form completion data
without actually knowing where these programs store them.
But maybe Okular's data is so different that I would escape the same backup
procedure that work for other programs. Time will tell.
Go ahead. I
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
I think the real solution is to fix poppler so store the annotations in
the Document according to the PDF standard (and use one of the adhoc
tricks to store annotations in PS files). This is what every user
...
You're
On Monday, 2012-01-23, Dan Armbrust wrote:
If storing data to prefill form fields would be considered malware,
people would have a hard time browsing the Internet since malware
removal tools would have deinstalled all incarnations of browsers
already.
One minor point. A PDF viewer is
On Tuesday, 2012-01-17, Duncan wrote:
Kevin Krammer posted on Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:08:31 +0100 as excerpted:
On Sunday, 2012-01-15, Dan Armbrust wrote:
Hmm. Most software with autocompletion support does that. E.g.
browsers,
email programs.
They also ask your permission first.
If storing data to prefill form fields would be considered malware, people
would
have a hard time browsing the Internet since malware removal tools would have
deinstalled all incarnations of browsers already.
One minor point. A PDF viewer is not web browser. Its much more like
a document
Kevin Krammer posted on Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:43:30 +0100 as excerpted:
My guess is at least 4.10 but I find even 4.11 likely.
An important fact here is that while during KDE4 times the split of
names or terminology around KDE products was mostly cosmetic, KDE5
will very likely make actual use
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Actually, I wonder if this idea could get a bit more traction in view of
the new ksecrets thing? That'd play off the whole fascination with the
new and shiny technology thing, instead of being seen as the drudge-work
that
John McCabe-Dansted posted on Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:18:58 +0800 as
excerpted:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Actually, I wonder if this idea could get a bit more traction in view
of the new ksecrets thing? That'd play off the whole fascination with
the new
Kevin Krammer posted on Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:08:31 +0100 as excerpted:
On Sunday, 2012-01-15, Dan Armbrust wrote:
Hmm. Most software with autocompletion support does that. E.g.
browsers,
email programs.
They also ask your permission first.
Interesting. Neither Konqueror, Firefox,
On Saturday, 2012-01-14, Dan Armbrust wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Kevin Krammer kevin.kram...@gmx.at
wrote:
When introducing a new party to a converstation, in this case the KDE
user mailinglist, it is usually very helpful to provide context to said
new party.
When the
Hmm. Most software with autocompletion support does that. E.g. browsers, email
programs.
They also ask your permission first. And they have an off switch.
And, they definitely don't autocomplete fields which are know to
contain private info - aka - passwords. Unless you go through another
On Sunday, 2012-01-15, Dan Armbrust wrote:
Hmm. Most software with autocompletion support does that. E.g. browsers,
email programs.
They also ask your permission first.
Interesting. Neither Konqueror, Firefox, KMail or Thunderbird have asked me
whether I wanted to store form data.
Can you
Am 15.01.2012 18:08, schrieb Kevin Krammer:
On Sunday, 2012-01-15, Dan Armbrust wrote:
Hmm. Most software with autocompletion support does that. E.g. browsers,
email programs.
They also ask your permission first.
Interesting. Neither Konqueror, Firefox, KMail or Thunderbird have asked me
It is an important issue. Specially under countries protecting personal
data by law, like spain for example in where law says personal data belongs
to the person it refers to instead of the company or program having it.
Despite it being free software I think it should be fair at least
protecting
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 16:03, Dan Armbrust
daniel.armbrust.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Dan, I understand you are frustrated. But this here doesn't help to
solve the problem. In fact it makes it a lot less likely that Albert
or one of the other Okular developers will work on it. So ultimately
you
On 1/13/2012 9:03 AM, Dan Armbrust wrote:
Dan, I understand you are frustrated. But this here doesn't help to
solve the problem. In fact it makes it a lot less likely that Albert
or one of the other Okular developers will work on it. So ultimately
you are hurting your case.
Now let's move this
Dude.. if you spent half as much time submitting a patch, as you did
complaining about the issue, it would be fixed yesterday..
Quit complaining, you aren't paying for this software. Fix it yourself, or
stop using it.
No one cares just because you want to whine like a spoiled little brat.
When introducing a new party to a converstation, in this case the KDE user
mailinglist, it is usually very helpful to provide context to said new party.
When the discussion has happened on one mailinglist so far, a good way to do
that is to provide a link to the discussion start in the original
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Kevin Krammer kevin.kram...@gmx.at wrote:
When introducing a new party to a converstation, in this case the KDE user
mailinglist, it is usually very helpful to provide context to said new party.
When the discussion has happened on one mailinglist so far, a
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
Want me to unsubscribe you from the list? Reached this point in what the only
thing you want to do is harass me i think it is the only sensible thing to do.
Albert
Now _there_ is a mature response. Users report a
Sorry, I can't say that, i know it exists, I've known it for ages, i just
don't feel it is the next think i have to do in my life (next thing is getting
my Kindle and reading some stuff), if you think it is important, do it
yourself or get some money and hire someone to fix it, i know a few
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Dan Armbrust
daniel.armbrust.l...@gmail.com wrote:
So, you have proven that you don't take a security issue seriously.
To be fair, fixing this bug wouldn't stop sensitive information
appearing in swap. Sensitive information also has a tendency to appear
in /tmp
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:26 PM, jordon...@gmail.com wrote:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267350
--- Comment #1 from Jackson Peacock pickled kde pepperedpeacock org
2011-04-04 03:11:36 ---
I just noticed the same issue. I had stored some filled out forms on an
encrypted drive. I ran
23 matches
Mail list logo
