[kde] Re: 4.7 nepomuk won't die

2011-07-31 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Sunday, 2011-07-31, Duncan wrote: Kevin Krammer posted on Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:48:45 +0200 as excerpted: On Saturday, 2011-07-30, Duncan wrote: As for a setting controlling startup: lets assume there would be an option which would prohibit Akonadi server start. Should all

[kde] Re: 4.7 nepomuk won't die

2011-07-31 Thread Duncan
Kevin Krammer posted on Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:29:06 +0200 as excerpted: On Sunday, 2011-07-31, Duncan wrote: Kevin Krammer posted on Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:48:45 +0200 as excerpted: On Saturday, 2011-07-30, Duncan wrote: As for a setting controlling startup: lets assume there would be an

[kde] Re: 4.7 nepomuk won't die

2011-07-30 Thread Duncan
Kevin Krammer posted on Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:13:27 +0200 as excerpted: On Saturday, 2011-07-30, Duncan wrote: knode isn't akonadified... yet, altho there's an akonadi news resource that looks like they're headed in that direction, and akregator doesn't yet require it either, but given the

[kde] Re: 4.7 nepomuk won't die

2011-07-30 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Saturday, 2011-07-30, Duncan wrote: Kevin Krammer posted on Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:13:27 +0200 as excerpted: Given Gentoo's highly adaptive build handling, it should be possible to have slightly extended KDE build system files which explicitly check for certain libraries in the kdepimlibs

[kde] Re: 4.7 nepomuk won't die

2011-07-30 Thread Felix Miata
On 2011/07/30 11:55 (GMT) Duncan composed: There REALLY needs to be an option SOMEWHERE (discoverable, preferably in the notification itself, if that's possible) to turn that off. +2^2 I never use any of kmail, dolphin or *pim*, and can't imagine anything else I would actually use that