https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217695
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432809
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432215
--- Comment #9 from Mark Wielaard ---
Do we really need to redirect stderr to a temporary file and then use grep to
filter out any errors? If possible it would be nicer if we could simply do one
exec and simply drain stderr from the process till
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432215
--- Comment #8 from Mark Wielaard ---
+ if (VG_(getenv)("DEBUGINFOD_URLS") == NULL
+ || VG_(strcmp)("", VG_(getenv("DEBUGINFOD_URLS"))) == 0)
+ return NULL;
+
+ if ((path = ML_(find_executable)("debugi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432215
--- Comment #7 from Mark Wielaard ---
The patch includes some changes to tests/vg_regtest.in. I believe they aren't
needed anymore because you already submitted them in bug #432672. Or is the
explicit clearing of DEBUGINFOD_URLS still needed?
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432215
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard ---
Random comment that isn't really about the actual patch:
+#include "../m_initimg/priv_initimg_pathscan.h"
I see you need this for ML_(find_executable). Maybe this should moved somewhere
else so you
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432809
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432809
--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #1)
> We had something similar in bug #422174 with REX prefixed JMP instructions.
> Lets see what the instruction manual says...
It says (for PUSH, POP, PUSHF/D/Q, PO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432809
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432672
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432801
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432510
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140939
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217695
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #2 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140939
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #125774|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140178
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140178
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard ---
Created attachment 135476
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=135476=edit
Updated patch that also handle openat
The fix needs to handle both the open and openat syscalls.
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140178
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #4 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410743
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gand...@winds.org
--- Comment #9 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423929
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423361
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421262
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Lack of Proper (80 bit) |Lack of Proper (80 bit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421262
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Lack of Proper Long Double |Lack of Proper (80 bit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422261
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422261
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410743
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410743
--- Comment #7 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #6)
> This looks similar to what is reported against Fedora arm64:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909548
It isn't exactly the same issue. But r
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410743
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432215
--- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Aaron Merey from comment #3)
> (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #1)
> > - I think you need to drain stderr first in a while loop before doing the
> > VG_(waitpid)(pid, NULL, 0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432215
--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard ---
Also I think all the VG_(umsg) need to be guarded by if (VG_(clo_verbosity) >
0) so that there is no extra output when running with valgrind -q.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432215
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432102
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388706
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432102
Bug ID: 432102
Summary: Support DWARF5
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431157
--- Comment #11 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #10)
> What's the status here? The first glibc release with scv support is coming
> up. Thanks.
The status is still as in comment #7. There is a workaround (filteri
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431157
--- Comment #8 from Mark Wielaard ---
For reference, this explains the (newer) powerpc syscall conventions of the
linux kernel: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.10/powerpc/syscall64-abi.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431157
--- Comment #7 from Mark Wielaard ---
For now I have backported Florian's patch to the Fedora rawhide valgrind
package to get things unstuck:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=182
I had to tweak the patch a little to remove
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431157
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard ---
That looks plausible:
+/* Mask unrecognized HWCAP bits. Only keep the bits that have
+ * been mentioned above.
+ */
+auxv->u.a_val &= 0xfec4ULL;
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431157
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431157
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381819
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #24 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430866
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381819
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nuquaquara...@gmail.com
--- Comment #23 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385477
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430485
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430597
--- Comment #14 from Mark Wielaard ---
This looks like a QT/VMWare graphics issue
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-69993
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369029
--- Comment #19 from Mark Wielaard ---
*** Bug 430597 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430597
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #8 from Mark Wielaard
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430597
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397605
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430597
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369029
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hymu...@gmail.com
--- Comment #18 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430485
Bug ID: 430485
Summary: expr_is_guardable doesn't handle Iex_Qop
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844910
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430484
Bug ID: 430484
Summary: none/tests/arm64/atomics_v81 occassionally fails
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426014
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426014
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #134086|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430354
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430354
--- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard ---
Created attachment 134060
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=134060=edit
Implement stxsibx and stxsihx as direct byte or half-word store
This implements stxsibx and stxsihx as direct byte or half-w
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430354
Bug ID: 430354
Summary: ppc stxsibx and stxsihx instructions write too much
data
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430158
Bug ID: 430158
Summary: below main misses some "optimizations"
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408663
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #3 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382083
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #2 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429952
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #3 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404076
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #9 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414268
--- Comment #12 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to ahashmi from comment #11)
> > Since programs can also check features through the attribute/feature
> > registers, do we also need to filter those when inspected by the guest code?
> Hm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414268
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428909
--- Comment #20 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #18)
> Created attachment 133799 [details]
> Add configure time checking
>
> This patch now uses configure. The tests are fairly complicated, but seem to
> wor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428909
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427870
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428909
--- Comment #13 from Mark Wielaard ---
OK, I think I finally understand your patch, the alias is needed as
declaration, but then you still need to define the implementation. In drd the
implementation is done by calling one of the arguments of the macro
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428909
--- Comment #12 from Mark Wielaard ---
So one issue I had missed is that VG_Z_LIBPTHREAD_SONAME is defined as libcZdZa
(libc.*) is the source of the problem with MUSL because when we duplicate the
wrappers for VG_Z_LIBPTHREAD_SONAME
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428909
--- Comment #11 from Mark Wielaard ---
Hi Paul,
(In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #10)
> I'll attempt to add as many explanations as possible.
Thanks, sorry for being so slow.
It doesn't really help (IMHO) that we are trying to fix an is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429692
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429692
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428909
--- Comment #9 from Mark Wielaard ---
I must admit that I don't understand how the weak alias trick works.
Why does the same trick not work for musl?
And how is solaris different?
BTW. I think it would be nice to make this 2 commits (maybe even bugs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414268
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
There are two machines this seems to work correctly on:
Arch and hwcaps: ARM64, LittleEndian, v8.1-rdm-atomics
Arch and hwcaps: ARM64, LittleEndian, v8.2-dpcvap-rdm-atomics-fp16-vfp16
But one where I get Arch
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414268
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413547
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427404
--- Comment #21 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Carl Love from comment #20)
> Created attachment 133275 [details]
> Fix for the xscvhpdp assembler line issue
>
> The fix in comment 17 took care of the issues for non-Pow
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427404
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #18 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428909
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372347
--- Comment #27 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #22)
> I want to keep the prereq because in theory someone could be building with a
> very old GCC that does not support -fsized-deallocation.
And you were c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428862
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428858
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
Summary|unhandled
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408858
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boxe...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424012
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #4)
> Created attachment 133152 [details]
> Update patch to have less inconsistent indentation
>
> I've tried to make the indentation more consistent. The file
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372347
--- Comment #24 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #23)
> Created attachment 133151 [details]
> Update patch to cover both x86 and amd64
Looks good to me. I believe the sized_delete.stderr.exp file should match not
just
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428716
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #4 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384729
--- Comment #7 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #6)
> Created attachment 133107 [details]
> Patch as per discussion
Looks correct to me.
But I don't have any non-glibc system around to test it.
--
You are rec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424012
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #3 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372347
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #21 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426014
--- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard ---
Created attachment 132887
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=132887=edit
Fix ARM64Instr_VTriS/D argument order
Turned out we had one typo assigning arguments (skipping arg2 and using arg3
tw
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427787
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427870
--- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard ---
Created attachment 132536
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=132536=edit
Don't compile ppc64be tests on ppc64le
There is a similar issue with the ldst_multiple testcase.
This patch works aro
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427931
Bug ID: 427931
Summary: gdbserver_tests/nlcontrolc.vgtest hangs on fedora
rawhide
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427870
Bug ID: 427870
Summary: lmw, lswi and related PowerPC insns aren't allowed on
ppc64le
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427787
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427787
Bug ID: 427787
Summary: Support new faccessat2 linux syscall (439)
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888170
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426014
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
Created attachment 132351
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=132351=edit
ARM64 VEX frontend support for fmadd/fmsub
This should implement the frontend support by replacing the separate Iop_
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426014
--- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard ---
Created attachment 132242
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=132242=edit
arm64 VEX backend support for Iop_M{Add,Sub}F{32,64} to fmadd and fmsub
Sassha was experimenting with turning the fmadd/fm
601 - 700 of 1231 matches
Mail list logo
