[liquidshell] [Bug 464052] Easier closing of notifications

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464052 --- Comment #2 from Mikko Merikivi --- Hmm, after further thinking, I feel like this could be because I've installed Discord as a Flatpak. It's probably messed up some inter-process communication pipeline or another. -- You are receiving this mail

[liquidshell] [Bug 464052] New: Easier closing of notifications

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464052 Bug ID: 464052 Summary: Easier closing of notifications Classification: Miscellaneous Product: liquidshell Version: 1.8.1 Platform: unspecified OS: Linux Status:

[liquidshell] [Bug 452286] Option to disable panel

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452286 Mikko Merikivi changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG Status|REPORTED

[liquidshell] [Bug 452286] Option to disable panel

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452286 --- Comment #4 from Mikko Merikivi --- That seems to be working. Can I put it into config somehow or something so I can just select a Liquidshell session or whatever it was called? I guess I could create some autostart script if there's no built

[liquidshell] [Bug 452286] Option to disable panel

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452286 --- Comment #2 from Mikko Merikivi --- I'll try explaining again. The default desktop shell, Plasmashell, has memory leaks. Therefore using it is not a favored option. However, going shell-less seems not very great either, since when if I quit

[liquidshell] [Bug 452286] New: Option to disable panel

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452286 Bug ID: 452286 Summary: Option to disable panel Product: liquidshell Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: wishlist

[lattedock] [Bug 447882] New: Windows go under an Always Visible panel on dual monitors

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447882 Bug ID: 447882 Summary: Windows go under an Always Visible panel on dual monitors Product: lattedock Version: 0.10.6 Platform: Archlinux Packages OS: Linux

[krunner] [Bug 386513] Krunner memory leak

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386513 Mikko Merikivi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikko...@gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Mikko

[lattedock] [Bug 445532] [feature] - allow OnDemand panels to reserve space when unhidden

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445532 --- Comment #3 from Mikko Merikivi --- I suppose, since complexity is a consideration that you probably have in mind in your questioning attitude toward the necessity of the suggested feature, why do we even have a separate On Demand Sidebar? Why just

[lattedock] [Bug 445532] [feature] - allow OnDemand panels to reserve space when unhidden

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445532 --- Comment #2 from Mikko Merikivi --- > 1. What are the benefits compared to the current provided visibility modes? > 3. Why not use an AutoHide panel? I've not seen an option where the panel can get hidden but when visible it resizes overl