[digikam] [Bug 451079] New: Add date as filter rule

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=451079 Bug ID: 451079 Summary: Add date as filter rule Product: digikam Version: unspecified Platform: Microsoft Windows OS: Microsoft Windows Status: REPORTED

[digikam] [Bug 425150] Option to filter images by orientation, resolution, ISO...

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425150 --- Comment #5 from Pedja --- I am ware of difference on search and filtering. Thing there should be no difference in criteria, ti is just matter hos data is handled. I do not object. Search suits me. It is just it does not have to be buried so deep

[digikam] [Bug 425150] Option to filter images by orientation, resolution, ISO...

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425150 --- Comment #3 from Pedja --- Well, Advanced Search is option I am looking for. I was struggling with left and right frames trying to somehow select photos i need and found it very uncomfortable and not functional. Advanced Search does all that I

[digikam] [Bug 425150] Option to filter images by orientation, resolution, ISO...

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425150 Pedja changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||usability -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[digikam] [Bug 425150] New: Option to filter images by orientation, resolution, ISO...

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425150 Bug ID: 425150 Summary: Option to filter images by orientation, resolution, ISO... Product: digikam Version: unspecified Platform: unspecified OS: Unspecified

[digikam] [Bug 425150] Option to filter images by orientation, resolution, ISO...

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425150 Pedja changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pe...@supurovic.net -- You are receiving this mail

[digikam] [Bug 423386] Unconfirmed face detections treated as confirmed

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423386 --- Comment #5 from Pedja --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #4) > The wrong or recognized persons already appear under the name is desired. > However, these have not yet been confirmed. You can see that the overlay > widget appe

[digikam] [Bug 423386] Unconfirmed face detections treated as confirmed

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423386 --- Comment #3 from Pedja --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #2) > When you speak of filters do you mean the filter in the right sidebar of > digiKam? > > Maik I am new to digikam so I might be doing something wrong. By filters

[digikam] [Bug 423387] Add Button to instanlty set face tag as Unknown

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423387 --- Comment #2 from Pedja --- (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #1) > A student is currently working on this problem as part of GSoC 2020. > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423114#c1 > > Maik > > *** Thi

[digikam] [Bug 423387] Add Button to instanlty set face tag as Unknown

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423387 Pedja changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pe...@supurovic.net -- You are receiving this mail

[digikam] [Bug 423387] New: Add Button to instanlty set face tag as Unknown

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423387 Bug ID: 423387 Summary: Add Button to instanlty set face tag as Unknown Product: digikam Version: 6.4.0 Platform: MS Windows OS: Microsoft Windows Status: REPORTED

[digikam] [Bug 423386] Unconfirmed face detections treated as confirmed

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423386 Pedja changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pe...@supurovic.net -- You are receiving this mail

[digikam] [Bug 423386] Unconfirmed face detections treated as confirmed

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423386 Pedja changed: What|Removed |Added URL||face tag, scanning

[digikam] [Bug 423386] New: Unconfirmed face detections treated as confirmed

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423386 Bug ID: 423386 Summary: Unconfirmed face detections treated as confirmed Product: digikam Version: 6.4.0 Platform: MS Windows OS: Microsoft Windows Status: REPORTED