https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383086
--- Comment #15 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
It would be cool if you could report this to ubuntu and post a link here as a
cross-reference to keep track of what they say.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382960
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379219
--- Comment #25 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
I don't think that is a good comparison.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383086
--- Comment #13 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
(In reply to Kevin Funk from comment #11)
> You could try the AppImage from https://www.kdevelop.org/download -- but
> honestly I'm not exactly sure whether you'll be running into th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383086
--- Comment #6 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Hm yeah, I guessed something like this would happen: you have two (or more)
packages installed which need different versions of llvm. Still, sorry, you
have to discuss this on your distribu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383086
--- Comment #4 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Yes please try, and please also report a packaging bug to Ubuntu, this must not
happen. They need to be properly seperated somehow.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watchi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383086
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Reso
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382874
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383057
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376141
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382901
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382861
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Reso
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382861
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379219
--- Comment #23 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
I don't even think this issue is specific to KDevelop. For example I have a
shell which does "git status" and shows a prompt depending on that -- lots of
people have that. If
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379219
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Reso
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379219
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.san...@pob
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382850
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363269
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit|54c2740ae97f4e3ee7675ff06ec |https://commits.kde.o
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363269
--- Comment #31 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Ah yes, if you trick the mimetype detection, you will still crash. You are also
right about strncpy.
phabricator should be simple enough to use, just log in (with
identity.kde.org),
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363269
--- Comment #28 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Patch still looks sensible to me -- maybe use strncpy instead, and put it on
phabricator.kde.org so somebody familiar with the code can have a look?
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363269
--- Comment #27 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Does that still happen with KDevelop 5.1+? I thought I fixed it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382652
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://commits.kde.o
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367798
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://commits.kde.o
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367798
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever con
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378827
--- Comment #11 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
I don't recall -- did we ever fix this issue? I know we had a discussion and a
RR ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382401
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever con
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382405
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.1.1 |5.36.0
As
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382405
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCON
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382405
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Reso
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382405
--- Comment #1 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Hmm, sorry, what's wrong here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382401
--- Comment #4 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Hm sorry, KDevelop 5 doesn't support Python 2 any more and I don't think it
makes sense to add support for it in this one place :/
I even recall I ported to this API specifically because t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382401
--- Comment #1 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Hm, did you start kdevelop like
PYTHONPATH=/home/user/kdevelop/FreeCAD/build/lib:$PYTHONPATH kdevelop?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376080
--- Comment #2 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Does it work if you type "python3" instead of python?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353309
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382147
--- Comment #6 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
QML can be mentioned but not Go, it has no released stable version yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381999
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |INVALID
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381829
--- Comment #11 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
That is definitely KDevelop 4 crashing. For 5, all the plugins are installed
into a versioned subdirectory ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381829
--- Comment #9 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
What I would like to see would be an actual file listing and an actual error
message / trace of what happens.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381829
--- Comment #7 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Yes but then what? What versions of what files are on the system and what
happenw when you start kdevelop?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381829
--- Comment #5 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
I don't even get how you manage to get it to start up / load anything with
those two not at the same version. We have SOVERSION info on the shared libs
and we have versioned plugins. Have a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381957
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.1.1 |5.35.0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381829
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381709
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381203
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381123
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380516
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379219
--- Comment #17 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Well programming is complicated sometimes ...
"don't run any git operations unless the window has focus" certainly isn't an
acceptable solution either way.
--
You are rec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379219
--- Comment #15 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
It wasn't, but that makes sense. It could still wait for a bit for the lock to
become available though.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379219
--- Comment #13 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
You created half a page of analogies but none of them has an actual argument
which explains why it makes sense for git to release the lock during rebasing
and then fail when somethin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380131
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379219
--- Comment #11 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
I still think this needs to be fixed in git, if you run a rebase and then "git
status" in a different terminal, you will have the same issue ...
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378827
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379219
--- Comment #4 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Also I'm not super excited about libgit2, it's another incredibly complex piece
of software running in-process and potentially crashing (ask the kate people).
Out-of-process looks messy but
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379219
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379263
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378933
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378827
--- Comment #4 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Alright thanks, I'll try ASAP
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378827
--- Comment #2 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Do you have debug symbols by any chance? Otherwise I can also try to reproduce
this ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378651
--- Comment #5 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Hm, I loaded that project here and didn't see any problems when clicking around
for a while.
One thing you can try is closing KDevelop, then removing ~/.cache/kdevduchain
-- does tha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378777
--- Comment #23 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Sorry, I don't see what this leads to in context of this bug report :/
If you have a concrete suggestion on what to improve and how, please submit a
patch to phabricator.kde.org or start a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378777
--- Comment #20 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
(In reply to Markus Elfring from comment #19)
> (In reply to Sven Brauch from comment #18)
> > That code is in KDevelop itself, in the NavigationWidget class.
>
> It seem
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378777
--- Comment #18 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
That code is in KDevelop itself, in the NavigationWidget class. The issue is
not there though.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378777
--- Comment #16 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
So by "related software infrastructure" you mean "KDevelop"? That's not super
intuitive wording.
Even with that, I don't know what you mean; the issue is that we
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378777
--- Comment #14 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
(In reply to Markus Elfring from comment #13)
> How do you think about to reconsider any related software infrastructure?
> Will any further tweaks become relevant for source cod
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378777
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Reso
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378777
--- Comment #10 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
You mean, show a hint that a define is missing in order to have that struct
defined? That would certainly be useful, but I'm not sure how difficult it is
to do.
Is your problem solved?
-
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378777
--- Comment #8 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Yes, it apparently has some #defines which KDevelop doesn't know of. Add them
in your project configuration (right-click project, open configuration) under
"Includes/Defines", the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378777
--- Comment #6 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Maybe some header included by a file included by this one is not found? You
should be able to get to the definition of this struct just by Ctrl+Click-ing
on the #include dire
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378777
--- Comment #4 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
It considers that struct a forward declaration, which causes the warning.
Something's missing, either an include path, or some define ... can you look if
any includes are missing in th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378777
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377852
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|general |general
As
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378651
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296800
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378490
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378428
--- Comment #6 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
To write down the lowercase problem here (discussed in IRC), the symbols are
all stored in lowercase in the DUChain, because PHP is case-insensitive, and I
don't think you can reasonably
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378428
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Enable symbol list panel|usability
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378428
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378357
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378196
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378111
--- Comment #12 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
You can just use the AppImage we provide meanwhile.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378107
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378097
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378083
--- Comment #1 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Yeah, this is a difficult case. In my opinion the current behaviour is ok: you
cannot sensibly call the function before defining the variable, so you can just
as well re-order your code to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377991
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377918
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377720
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever con
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377634
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375849
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://commits.kde.o
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377183
Bug ID: 377183
Summary: Qt Help GHNS needs to be moved to store.kde.org
Product: kdevelop
Version: 5.0.80
Platform: Other
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377026
--- Comment #7 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Sorry, that is the snippets plugin I was talking about. It's called "template
engine" internally, so I got confused ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377026
--- Comment #6 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Templates are fully scriptable and you can have editable fields for e.g. the
class name. You can also generate code depending on the content of editable
template fields. It's not a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377026
--- Comment #4 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
> But for a class, a functor or even a (C++) Template skeleton, I don't always
> wish to create new files with a (kdevelop) template, but rather write a
> simple,
> small
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377026
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGF
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376955
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Reso
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376955
--- Comment #3 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Ah ok, just run kdevelop in gdb by hand:
# gdb kdevelop
> run
Then when it crashes, generate the backtrace by typing
> thread apply all bt
Greetings, Sven
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376955
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGF
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376717
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373093
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373764
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@jbev.net
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373093
--- Comment #10 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
To clarify what I meant, setting it in the application still switches "at
runtime", just automatically at each startup, and thus has the same issue in
this case.
--
You are rec
401 - 500 of 856 matches
Mail list logo
