[Discover] [Bug 400612] Discover shouldn't have flatpak-backend and snap-backend as hard dependency

2018-11-04 Thread RaitaroH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400612 --- Comment #4 from RaitaroH --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #3) > Thanks, it takes a big man to apologize! Thank you. I can say at the very least that removing discover (along with flatpak and snapd) is not so bad (a few GBs free for me).

[Discover] [Bug 400612] Discover shouldn't have flatpak-backend and snap-backend as hard dependency

2018-11-04 Thread Aleix Pol
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400612 Aleix Pol changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DOWNSTREAM Status|REPORTED

[Discover] [Bug 400612] Discover shouldn't have flatpak-backend and snap-backend as hard dependency

2018-11-04 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400612 --- Comment #3 from Nate Graham --- Thanks, it takes a big man to apologize! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[Discover] [Bug 400612] Discover shouldn't have flatpak-backend and snap-backend as hard dependency

2018-11-04 Thread RaitaroH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400612 --- Comment #2 from RaitaroH --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #1) > > But is stupid. > https://community.kde.org/Get_Involved/Bug_Reporting#Remember_your_manners > > I understand that this is frustrating, but let's try to keep it technical. >

[Discover] [Bug 400612] Discover shouldn't have flatpak-backend and snap-backend as hard dependency

2018-11-03 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400612 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@kde.org --- Comment #1 from Nate Graham