https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369554
--- Comment #14 from David Faure ---
The double-asterix is a zsh shortcut for a recursive search, very convenient.
I'm not convinced that your proposed change isn't just as "manual" as the one I
have in mind. But feel free to prove me by showing me a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369554
--- Comment #13 from RJVB ---
>Are you saying that non-namespaced-headers frameworks like KCoreAddons, do not
>trigger any issue with case sensitive filesystem?
I suppose you mean case INsensitive filesystems :) Indeed, non-namespaced
frameworks are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369554
--- Comment #12 from David Faure ---
Are you saying that non-namespaced-headers frameworks like KCoreAddons, do not
trigger any issue with case sensitive filesystem?
I hope you didn't spend too much time making that list, it's easy to find with
grep
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369554
--- Comment #11 from RJVB ---
OK, so I was wrong in thinking that only a minority of frameworks do this
let's-add-another-directory-layer thing (which still feels like a solution in
search of a problem to me).
Here's the list I've compiled so far,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369554
--- Comment #10 from RJVB ---
>Ah you're still confused by non-namespaced frameworks vs namespaced frameworks.
Confused, no, I simply wasn't aware that one could want to try to apply
namespacing to headers too - and fail to see the point.
It's a bit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369554
--- Comment #9 from David Faure ---
Ah you're still confused by non-namespaced frameworks vs namespaced frameworks.
KIO, KParts and others behave like Attica: the class is namespaced
(KParts::Part) so the forwarding header is namespaced (KParts/Part).
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369554
--- Comment #8 from RJVB ---
>This is definitely not just about two frameworks, it's about ALL of them. Look
>at it, they all install forwarding headers.
Did you miss the bit where I said the others all install the forwarding headers
at the same
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369554
--- Comment #7 from David Faure ---
This is definitely not just about two frameworks, it's about ALL of them. Look
at it, they all install forwarding headers.
Reducing the number of -I arguments is not a goal, it's in fact
counter-productive. We want
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369554
--- Comment #6 from RJVB ---
So this works with Attica, but then again, I haven't found a single case where
its forwarding headers are used nowadays...
Now just to backpedal a bit: what is the interest of adding an additional
"layer" of directories in
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369554
--- Comment #5 from RJVB ---
>Well the lowercase headers contain C++ code too, so the name C++ doesn't really
Yeah, but that isn't really the point, is it? The point is where they're used.
Maybe I should ask why these headers actually exist?
>You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369554
--- Comment #4 from David Faure ---
Well the lowercase headers contain C++ code too, so the name C++ doesn't really
make sense for the forwarding headers, I think "fwd" makes more sense.
Other than that, it's pretty much the same idea indeed.
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369554
--- Comment #3 from RJVB ---
Created attachment 118533
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=118533=edit
alternative patch, for Attica
Wow, it's been ages since I thought of this one, good thing I wrote a very
detailed issue description!
I had
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369554
David Faure changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fa...@kde.org
--- Comment #2 from David Faure
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369554
RJVB changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://git.reviewboard.kde
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369554
Simon Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simonandr...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369554
--- Comment #1 from RJVB ---
I don't really know how invasive it would be to address this issue properly, or
rather, how to fix this without being overly invasive. Looking at KPeople I see
16 matches
Mail list logo