[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-05-26 Thread Maik Qualmann
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 --- Comment #16 from Maik Qualmann --- https://invent.kde.org/kde/digikam/commit/1cb00166bc116696106780119db648416b73d10c Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-05-25 Thread IWBR
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 --- Comment #15 from IWBR --- It's me again. I found two pictures whose date was not detected correctly from the filename: 14-09-04_1918.jpg -> 9/4/1918 0:00:00 14-09-04_1937.jpg -> 9/4/1937 0:00:00 I guess it automatically assumes that "19xx" is

[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-05-03 Thread Maik Qualmann
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 --- Comment #14 from Maik Qualmann --- Git commit 1251c037fec4499e0f9828b2bbf6acee23e0926c by Maik Qualmann. Committed on 03/05/2019 at 06:03. Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'. accepts the point as a time separator M +5-4

[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-05-02 Thread IWBR
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 --- Comment #13 from IWBR --- Hey, I've been playing with this new functions, and works great! It detected virtually all date formats I found in my pictures. Btw, one of the formats that could not detect, though, was the date used by early Android

[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-04-29 Thread Maik Qualmann
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 --- Comment #12 from Maik Qualmann --- To support the variant without a year I do not see as meaningful. This should definitely remain an automatic function. I have a long list of test files, where you already think about which date is hidden behind it

[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-04-29 Thread Maik Qualmann
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 --- Comment #11 from Maik Qualmann --- Git commit a11cbd3b7505187e23024d73c6532b41c9e0c56f by Maik Qualmann. Committed on 29/04/2019 at 20:39. Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'. add cases for date from filename M +9-6

[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-04-29 Thread Nicofo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 Nicofo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nic...@tuxfamily.org --- Comment #10 from Nicofo ---

[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-04-28 Thread Maik Qualmann
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 --- Comment #9 from Maik Qualmann --- Git commit b0f560f8982d67dea435f86762340941f58dee2b by Maik Qualmann. Committed on 28/04/2019 at 18:17. Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'. add case for date from filename M +2-0

[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-04-27 Thread IWBR
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 --- Comment #8 from IWBR --- For the sake of completeness, I've found that pictures taken with a Nokia C6-00 had this format: ddmm[xxx].jpg, such as: 01032012020.jpg, corresponding to the 1st of March, 2012, and the last there digits correspond to

[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-04-26 Thread Maik Qualmann
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 --- Comment #7 from Maik Qualmann --- Git commit c0ee7dc6d208fb9afc4509479bb084559d39b566 by Maik Qualmann. Committed on 26/04/2019 at 22:11. Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'. add file name date format from Motorola phone M +20 -3

[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-04-26 Thread Maik Qualmann
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 --- Comment #6 from Maik Qualmann --- Yes, this format "dd-mm-yy hhmm.jpg" would not be recognized at this time. I'll add it tonight. This image "20072008(001).jpg" is not a problem. The attempt with "MMdd" would fail because the month is invalid.

[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-04-26 Thread IWBR
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 --- Comment #5 from IWBR --- I also found that some nokia phones (e.g. nokia 6120c) used the format ddmm.jpg, which can also lead to confusion. For instance, I have this picture: 20072008(001).jpg, corresponding to July 20th, 2008, where (001),

[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-04-26 Thread IWBR
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 --- Comment #4 from IWBR --- No, that's great. I had a phone which used the format "dd-mm-yy hhmm.jpg" (I think motorolas used to do that, with filenames like "08-11-05 2312.jpg") which can be confusing even for a human if you don't know the context.

[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-04-26 Thread Maik Qualmann
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 Maik Qualmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||metzping...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Maik

[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-04-26 Thread IWBR
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 --- Comment #2 from IWBR --- Wow, already? I thought it would be quite complicated to implement. I'll try it in the next build. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-04-25 Thread Maik Qualmann
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 Maik Qualmann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[digikam] [Bug 406855] Feature request: date from filename

2019-04-24 Thread IWBR
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855 IWBR changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail