https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Version Fixed In|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #31 from Maik Qualmann ---
Git commit 901227fa96db807e02b71a84c933d34b97ce3ec3 by Maik Qualmann.
Committed on 09/09/2020 at 19:56.
Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'.
changes to setStatus() function
Related: bug 423632, bug 426175
M
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #30 from Maik Qualmann ---
Ok, my guess is that the pointer we call from the QMap is no longer valid and
the task was already been deleted...
Maik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #29 from Simon Westersund ---
Created attachment 131500
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=131500=edit
gdb backtrace with latest master a06b3c5
With the a06b3c5 commit from yesterday the face detection was able to proceed
for a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #28 from Maik Qualmann ---
Git commit a06b3c5dcc32a2f95c5fbf0ac2fa898931524cea by Maik Qualmann.
Committed on 08/09/2020 at 20:05.
Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'.
add static cast for loading notifikation
Related: bug 423632, bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #27 from Simon Westersund ---
Created attachment 131491
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=131491=edit
gdb backtrace with latest master fb76325
I tested with the latest master, which includes the latest fixes which Maik
referred
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #26 from Simon Westersund ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #23)
> Hi Simon,
>
> Please read also the story form this bug:
>
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426175
>
> This touch code from git/master, for next 7.2.0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #25 from Maik Qualmann ---
Git commit cde3403938b82e0cfcccb1b557b6c2319ac8557e by Maik Qualmann.
Committed on 08/09/2020 at 10:37.
Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'.
add base classes initialization explicit in the constructor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #24 from Maik Qualmann ---
Right, we call a pure virtual function in this function, the "LoadingProcess()
= 0. This LoadingProcess was overloaded by a SharedLoadingTask. So why are we
in the pure virtual function with this crash? Sorry,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #23 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Hi Simon,
Please read also the story form this bug:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426175
This touch code from git/master, for next 7.2.0 release.
Best
Gilles Caulier
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #22 from Simon Westersund ---
Created attachment 131483
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=131483=edit
gdb backtrace with latest gsoc20 branch c1861ba
Thank you for the information Maik! I read your comment too late, so I tested
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #21 from Maik Qualmann ---
Git commit 7619d77c98e3b3f955274805ba6720cd88fd714d by Maik Qualmann.
Committed on 07/09/2020 at 20:06.
Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'.
disable for a test ImageMagick
M +4-0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #20 from Maik Qualmann ---
In the gsoc20-facesengine-recognition branch there is no more development,
everything has been added to the master branch.
Maik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #19 from Simon Westersund ---
Created attachment 131477
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=131477=edit
gdb backtrace with latest master 5102e32
I retested the master branch. This time my collection was processed until 26%
and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #18 from Maik Qualmann ---
Git commit dd40e0f1912277dfef3967b56f32d44c01c05874 by Maik Qualmann.
Committed on 01/09/2020 at 20:07.
Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'.
protect loading QMap with a recursive mutex
M +11 -1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #17 from Simon Westersund ---
Created attachment 131350
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=131350=edit
gdb backtrace with gsoc20 branch + latest master 2fb8679
I tried this again with the gsoc20-facesengine-recognition branch +
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #16 from Maik Qualmann ---
Git commit 0308e3639955c0a07a9ec7100cdc6527841b6a12 by Maik Qualmann.
Committed on 26/08/2020 at 17:14.
Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'.
check if there is a loading thread
M +1-2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #15 from Simon Westersund ---
Created attachment 131186
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=131186=edit
gdb backtrace with gsoc20 branch + b61d547a and b3baed64 patches
So I tried to apply Maik's earlier patch to get around the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #14 from Simon Westersund ---
Created attachment 131183
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=131183=edit
gdb backtrace with gsoc20 branch + b61d547a patch
I applied the patch which Maik commented, and now I got the crash with the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #13 from Maik Qualmann ---
Git commit b61d547aac23ba68ee355d24960c1f148ece23d2 by Maik Qualmann.
Committed on 25/08/2020 at 20:02.
Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'.
move static functions from private shared data to a separate class
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #12 from Simon Westersund ---
Created attachment 131182
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=131182=edit
gdb backtrace with gsoc20-facesengine-recognition 477fd19
Thanks for the suggestion Gilles!
I did what you suggested and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #11 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Simon,
I currently working with the student who improve the face engine for the
detection and the recognition workflow.
For the detection, the student who develop under Ubuntu, as introduced plenty
of
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #10 from Simon Westersund ---
Created attachment 131178
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=131178=edit
gdb backtrace with latest master 00883ba
I went ahead and built the latest master branch (up until commit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #9 from Simon Westersund ---
Created attachment 131176
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=131176=edit
gdb backtrace with patch b3baed6
Thanks for your patch suggestion! I applied the patch
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #8 from Maik Qualmann ---
The backtraces are very well known to us. Only the cause is not clear and why
we cannot reproduce it. Please try the commit to see if the problem can still
be reproduced.
Maik
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #7 from Maik Qualmann ---
Git commit b3baed64731a75097d2a50f53691c8c954eac26a by Maik Qualmann.
Committed on 24/08/2020 at 20:38.
Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'.
try without loading notification
M +4-0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #6 from Simon Westersund ---
Created attachment 131158
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=131158=edit
single-threaded gdb backtrace with digikam built from source
I tested without the "Work on all processor cores" option too, and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
Simon Westersund changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #131156|gdb thread apply all|gdb 'thread apply all
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #4 from Simon Westersund ---
Created attachment 131156
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=131156=edit
gdb thread apply all backtrace' with digikam built from source
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
Simon Westersund changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #131132|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
--- Comment #2 from Simon Westersund ---
@Maik, thanks for pointing this out. I tried to follow the instructions here:
https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Debugging/How_to_create_useful_crash_reports#Retrieving_a_backtrace_with_GDB
and only
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||metzping...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Maik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425723
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |crash
CC|
33 matches
Mail list logo
