https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449476
--- Comment #9 from Maik Qualmann ---
It's not really fast with MySQL and a lot of items in the view, because a lot
of database accesses have to be done sequentially. It's better with SQLite on
SSD. Database access should be more grouped...
Maik
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449476
--- Comment #8 from José Oliver-Didier ---
A quick glance of that last commit seems you found a way to group by number of
faces. Nice!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449476
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit|https://invent.kde.org/grap |https://invent.kde.org/grap
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449476
--- Comment #6 from Maik Qualmann ---
When you switch to the People view, the category always changes to Faces by
default.
We can't currently see if there are faces in the album view unless we load
so-called "extra data" from the database. And we would
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449476
--- Comment #5 from José Oliver-Didier ---
Won't this be a bit confusing for the user? I mean, the view setting suddenly
changes when you move from "Faces" to "Albums" view?
I was thinking another approach is to leave this as a menu option in "Albums"
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449476
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449476
--- Comment #3 from Maik Qualmann ---
And it is precisely this repetition that our view cannot do.
Maik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449476
--- Comment #2 from José Oliver-Didier ---
True. Windows Photo Gallery has a similar option in their "Group By" menu. What
it does is that it repeats the image when multiple people appear on an image.
However, programmatically it could lead to some
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449476
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||metzping...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Maik
