https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449546
--- Comment #6 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Note : BQM has a new tool to run G'MIC filtrers over the images in batch. G'MIC
processor is scriptable and very customizable. It include a Watermark tool :
Image Editor : https://i.imgur.com/t983Rz2.png
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449546
--- Comment #5 from Markus Brotschi ---
See, how Luminar this has solved:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/repmcw8inv1n465/Aufnahme73.jpg?dl=0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449546
--- Comment #4 from Markus Brotschi ---
Hi Gilles
Yes, I know, it is a "way" to do this. But it's very unflexible an needs too
much mouseclicks.
And a great disatvantage is: The watermark is placed. No chance to moove it a
little bit right or left
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449546
--- Comment #3 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
In BQM/Watermark tool, you can already apply a stamped image to sign photo. The
aspect ratio and the place are respected to put watermark at the same place if
photo sizes are not the same.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449546
--- Comment #2 from Markus Brotschi ---
Hi Maik
As the name says: A batch do always the same. The result is: It places the
watermark always to the same place.
See Luminar or other softwares: They have on the right side in the "tools" area
a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449546
--- Comment #1 from Maik Qualmann ---
Even easier than with the BQM? You know that you can save a workflow in BQM and
restore and use all tool settings with just one click?
Maik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449546
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|watermark tool to paste |Improve watermark tool to
