https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
b...@mwharrison.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@mwharrison.co.uk
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
Thomas Beckler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||neoderhac...@hotmail.com
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
Chris changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chrisc.gigam...@gmail.com
--- Comment #20 from Chris
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #19 from Craig ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #17)
> Hi Mike!
> I'll stop with face recognition for now. It frustrates me a little bit
> because I keep having to reject the same images over and over again. And
> because 90% of the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #18 from Andy ---
Mike = Maik! Sorry!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #17 from Andy ---
Hi Mike!
I'll stop with face recognition for now. It frustrates me a little bit because
I keep having to reject the same images over and over again. And because 90% of
the images are assigned to the wrong people.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #16 from Craig ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #14)
> I tested again.
> The "Reject Suggestion" function has no effect on the next face recognition.
> The same fake (wrong?) faces of a person will be suggested at the next
> detection.
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #15 from Maik Qualmann ---
The problem has already been reported. We do not currently save negative face
choices.
Maik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #14 from Andy ---
I tested again.
The "Reject Suggestion" function has no effect on the next face recognition.
The same fake (wrong?) faces of a person will be suggested at the next
detection.
Can I prevent this permanently?(I will also
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #13 from Craig ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #11)
> Hi!
> I now understand why the wrong results are coming.
> I read the manual again.
I am not sure that I agree with the manual saying that children versus adult
will be a problem as
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #12 from Craig ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #2)
> Hi!
>
> Maybe it also plays a big role if blurred faces are included in the
> recognition. I guess digiKam doesn't detect blurred faces to exclude them
> from face recognition?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #11 from Andy ---
Hi!
I now understand why the wrong results are coming.
I read the manual again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #10 from Andy ---
Created attachment 159875
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=159875=edit
Manual
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #9 from Andy ---
Hi Craig, I've been using version 8.1.0 for 2 weeks. I've noticed this behavior
with previous versions as well. The more faces I assigned, the worse the
recognition rate got.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #8 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
See here :
https://community.kde.org/GSoc/2023/StatusReports/QuocHungTran
Gilles Caulier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #7 from Craig ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #0)
> Created attachment 159757 [details]
> face recognition
>
> Hello,
> I hope my suggestion is worth considering.
> In my opinion, the face recognition is not very good. (With yolo and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #6 from Craig ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #1)
> Hi Tran,
>
> I CC you in this file as this report touch your GoSC 2023 project about face
> management.
>
> Gilles
Could you provide a link to this? I have tried to find
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
Craig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||craigfryer...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #5 from Andy ---
Hello Maik,
The accuracy value is 70.
It's difficult to describe. I hope the translator gets it right.
Several faces are suggested. The right ones will be confirmed by me.
The wrong ones are assigned the correct name.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #4 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Note: face workflow is described in the online documentation :
https://docs.digikam.org/en/main_window/people_view.html
If it miss something, please lets me hear...
Gilles Caulier
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||metzping...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Maik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
--- Comment #2 from Andy ---
Hi!
Maybe it also plays a big role if blurred faces are included in the
recognition. I guess digiKam doesn't detect blurred faces to exclude them from
face recognition? Blurred faces are still recognizable for a human. But
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471183
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||caulier.gil...@gmail.com,
24 matches
Mail list logo
