https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364955
--- Comment #7 from r...@alum.mit.edu ---
Nudge again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364955
João Vidal da Silva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joao.vidal.si...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364955
--- Comment #5 from r...@alum.mit.edu ---
My particular use case is that I want to mount all external filesystems (and
internal, but that's simply an fstab matter) noatime. Even relatime
drastically slows things down when copying large numbers of files
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364955
--- Comment #4 from r...@alum.mit.edu ---
Nudge
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364955
r...@alum.mit.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364955
Stefan Brüns changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364955
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||or...@cora.nwra.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364955
r...@alum.mit.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364955
--- Comment #1 from r...@alum.mit.edu ---
This is a really big headache. I really need shortname=lower, and I very much
want noatime for performance reasons when scanning through a big filesystem.
Is this going to get any attention?
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364955
Christian Boltz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kde-b...@cboltz.de
--
10 matches
Mail list logo