https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397563
Christoph Cullmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|CONFIRME
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397563
--- Comment #7 from Nate Graham ---
Not quite. That patch made the syntax highlighting radically better for sure,
but it didn't add a "recently used" or "frequently used" view.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397563
Ahmad Samir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a.samir...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Ahmad Sa
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397563
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397563
--- Comment #5 from Mark ---
(In reply to Christoph Cullmann from comment #4)
> Would a solution be that we just collect "which highlightings got set by the
> user" and have some "Recent" menu that shows the XX most used ones? That way
> this would natu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397563
Christoph Cullmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cullm...@kde.org
--- Comment #4 from Chris
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397563
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397563
--- Comment #2 from Mark ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #1)
> Would the need for this go away if Kate was better about choosing a syntax
> highlighting mode in the first place? What are the ones that it's not so
> good at?
I do not think it'
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397563
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO
CC|
