https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463754
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Yeleighton ---
(In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #3)
> Hm, maybe just use a better default value in kio_audiocd?
This is a good idea in itself but we need to be safe and we want our users to
feel safe. We cannot for
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463754
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Vogt ---
(In reply to Christopher Yeleighton from comment #2)
> (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #1)
>
> > IMO in this particular case the audiocd:/ protocol could handle the timeout
> > itself.
>
> The audiocd slave so
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463754
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Yeleighton ---
(In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #1)
> IMO in this particular case the audiocd:/ protocol could handle the timeout
> itself.
The audiocd slave sort of can handle this because you can set the paranoia
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463754
--- Comment #1 from Fabian Vogt ---
kio-fuse could in theory set a timeout for certain requests, but it's hard to
say what the timeout should be. Some requests should finish in <30s but some
protocols (especially over network) can take longer. It's also
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463754
Christopher Yeleighton changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
