https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Fri13 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||frii...@gmail.com
--- Comment #73 from Fri13 ---
I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
postix changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #72 from postix ---
FWIW, there were some further discussions and mockups on
https://phabricator.kde.org/M155
No further comments from my side as the discussions already brought up very
good arguments for this issue.
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #71 from ed...@tutanota.de ---
My God, I hate this bar! I've gone all over Google trying to figure out how to
remove it simply because I want to use the entire KDE ecosystem, but it's just
annoying
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
ed...@tutanota.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ed...@tutanota.de
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #70 from Ivo Smelhaus ---
It's hard to call a decision being wrong when you don't know the target group
as well.
There is a big target group of e.g. MS users, who loves app which decides most
of the things instead of them. And if somebody
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #69 from Peter Humphrey ---
This is still the wrong decision. You are taking away my responsibility for my
own actions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Bug Janitor Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|NOR |HI
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
postix changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Lukas Ba. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@web.de
--- Comment #68 from Lukas Ba. ---
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #67 from Peter Humphrey ---
(In reply to Niels from comment #66)
> Surprised to find that we cannot disable the bar (anymore), but are still
> allowed to obfuscate it by changing its colors. This makes little sense,
> unless the goal is to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Niels changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ni...@peen.ch
--- Comment #66 from Niels ---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #65 from Marcin Juszkiewicz ---
Bugs like this are one of reasons I stopped reporting bugs against KDE.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Mathew changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||model...@outlook.com.au
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Postix changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pos...@posteo.eu
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #64 from whatifgodwasoneo...@hotmail.com ---
(In reply to mail from comment #63)
> Is there maybe a fork of kmail that doesn't pander to the pathetic?
Maybe that would be a solution.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
m...@deryk.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@deryk.co.uk
--- Comment #63 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Christophe Giboudeaux changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ssliac...@gmail.com
--- Comment #62
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #61 from PK ---
Is anything happening with this bug? There are many reactions. E.g. a father
with a son who is visually handicapped and also the very respected Nate Graham
took the time to explain why this html-bar is a mistake - and he
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #60 from Peter Humphrey ---
(In reply to Martin Steigerwald from comment #59)
> KMail has clickable links also in plain text view. In HTML however
> the link can go to an entirely different location than what the user gets to
> see, while
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #59 from Martin Steigerwald ---
(In reply to Peter Humphrey from comment #58)
> (In reply to Christoph Feck from comment #55)
> > It is a security reason. You could receive an HTML mail that looks like a
> > plain text mail, and with HTML
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #58 from Peter Humphrey ---
(In reply to Christoph Feck from comment #55)
> It is a security reason. You could receive an HTML mail that looks like a
> plain text mail, and with HTML you have the ability to embed malicious links
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #57 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #56 from Nate Graham ---
I think most people don't object to real security. What people object to here
is the following:
- It's not clear how this thing actually generates any security. HTML emails
are not commonly understood by the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #55 from Christoph Feck ---
It is a security reason. You could receive an HTML mail that looks like a plain
text mail, and with HTML you have the ability to embed malicious links
everywhere. If you have no way to see that the message is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #54 from PK ---
What starts to puzzle me about this whole discussion is that no one ever took
the trouble of explaining why this bar had to be fixed. Why so many faithful
users had to be "kicked against the sore leg" as we say in my
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Konrad Rzepecki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hanni...@astral.lodz.pl
--- Comment #53 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #52 from avlas ---
(In reply to Sudhir Khanger from comment #51)
> Created attachment 117651 [details]
> html white bar
>
> Even if you set the colors to either white or grayish you will end up with
> same bad UI behavior.
>
> @avlas
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #51 from Sudhir Khanger ---
Created attachment 117651
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=117651=edit
html white bar
Even if you set the colors to either white or grayish you will end up with same
bad UI behavior.
@avlas Where do
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #50 from avlas ---
(In reply to Sudhir Khanger from comment #49)
> @avlas thanks for that info. By any chance do you have the code that is
> relevant for removing this egregious UI.
Sorry, perhaps I was not clear enough. These config
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #49 from Sudhir Khanger ---
@avlas thanks for that info. By any chance do you have the code that is
relevant for removing this egregious UI.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #48 from avlas ---
(In reply to avlas from comment #47)
> (In reply to Cristian Adam from comment #5)
> > I have found a partial workaround – namely changing the background color of
> > the HTML Status Bar.
> >
> > This can be done in
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Eridani Rodríguez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eridanired...@yahoo.com.mx
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #47 from avlas ---
(In reply to Cristian Adam from comment #5)
> I have found a partial workaround – namely changing the background color of
> the HTML Status Bar.
>
> This can be done in Settings -> Configure KMail -> Appearance ->
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Alexander Wilms changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||f.alexander.wi...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #46 from pqz ---
(In reply to Erik Quaeghebeur from comment #42)
> Another bug report (as feature request), kdepim-devel mailing list, KDE
Here it is: bug 399245 as a feature request
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #45 from Christophe Giboudeaux ---
*** Bug 393595 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #44 from pqz ---
(In reply to Christophe Giboudeaux from comment #33)
> As already mentioned earlier, this is intentional.
Wouldn't be more simple to change the type of this ticket (to feature request)
instead of opening another one ?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #43 from pqz ---
(In reply to Christophe Giboudeaux from comment #33)
> As already mentioned earlier, this is intentional.
Wouldn't be more simple to change the type of this ticket (to feature request)
instead of opening another one ?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #42 from Erik Quaeghebeur ---
(In reply to pqz from comment #41)
> And where is the right place to discuss alternative UI proposals ?
Another bug report (as feature request), kdepim-devel mailing list, KDE forums.
> There was no discussion
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #41 from pqz ---
(In reply to Erik Quaeghebeur from comment #36)
> (In reply to Sudhir Khanger from comment #35)
> > Is it necessary to keep it absolutely ugly and intrusive? Could we not come
> > up with a UI that is less distracting to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
pqz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pqz...@qbitdepot.com|kdepim-b...@kde.org
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
pqz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|kdepim-b...@kde.org |pqz...@qbitdepot.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Brent changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brenthuis...@gmail.com
--- Comment #40 from Brent ---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
avlas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsar...@gmail.com
--- Comment #39 from avlas ---
Yes,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #38 from Störm Poorun ---
Open source...
Part of the KDE family...
Not: 'I'm the maintainer, therefore we can ignore all Users without any
rational reason'.
It raises the question, who gets to decide here?
It would be a shame to have
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #37 from Peter Humphrey ---
(In reply to Christophe Giboudeaux from comment #33)
> As already mentioned earlier, this is intentional.
Being intentional doesn't mean it's a good idea. It isn't, as the flood of
comments here shows.
What
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #36 from Erik Quaeghebeur ---
(In reply to Sudhir Khanger from comment #35)
> Is it necessary to keep it absolutely ugly and intrusive? Could we not come
> up with a UI that is less distracting to the users. Take for example, it can
> be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #35 from Sudhir Khanger ---
Created attachment 115264
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=115264=edit
Alternate UI for the distracting and intrusive html bar
Is it necessary to keep it absolutely ugly and intrusive? Could we not
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Erik Quaeghebeur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@equaeghe.nospammail.net
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Christophe Giboudeaux changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Christophe Giboudeaux changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Attila changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugs.kde.att...@online.de
--- Comment #32 from Attila
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Pascal Patry changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@invalidip.com
--- Comment #31 from Pascal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Peter Humphrey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #30 from yu...@avrasoft.com ---
KMail 5.8.3 now, I have to add my vote that this is annoying, even with
Cristian's work-around. Please, Laurent! :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
yu...@avrasoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yu...@avrasoft.com
--- Comment #29 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #28 from Cristian Adam ---
It has been four months already. How hard is for a KDE developer to revert a
commit, review it, and merge it?
Is "Laurent Montel" the only developer who works on KMail?
If somebody does the revert today, it will
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Sudhir Khanger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sud...@sudhirkhanger.com
--- Comment #27 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Störm Poorun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@olan.org
--- Comment #26 from Störm Poorun
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
zebo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #25 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #24 from PK ---
Dear Canoe (of comment 23). I applied the workaround of Christian Adam in
comment 5.
For the two foreground-items I choose the darker grey #7c7c7c and for the
background items I choose the lighter grey #c0c0c0. It looks even
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Canoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brokenca...@gmail.com
--- Comment #23 from Canoe ---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
imraro changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||imr...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #22 from Christoph Feck ---
*** Bug 393473 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Coacher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||itumaykin+...@gmail.com
--- Comment #21 from Coacher
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Ivo Smelhaus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ivo.smelh...@gmail.com
--- Comment #20 from Ivo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@kde.org
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Richard Gladman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Pesho changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shake...@gmail.com
--- Comment #18
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #17 from PK ---
I too can't understand why this happened. To me it is a strange choice. In my
eyes there are a few (not much anymore) items to fix in kmail and this is NOT
one of them.
But still, you come a long
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #16 from pqz...@qbitdepot.com ---
@Laurent Montel: a new user wouldn't know about any option in the setting
dialog.
Your explanation makes no sense: should kmail disable any feature a new user
doesn't know about.
This is a regression bug not
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
pqz...@qbitdepot.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Steeven Hudon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||st...@hotmail.com
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
whatifgodwasoneo...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||whatifgodwasoneofus@hotmail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Jonathan Marten changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pqz...@qbitdepot.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #13 from bugzy ---
Is there any way to re-open this issue. Whereas it is understandable that some
kmail devs may want the html bar displayed by default in emails, there seems to
be no real justification, or at least a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Jonathan Marten changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthijstij...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Dmitry Ivanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dm.vl.iva...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #11 from Jani-Matti Hätinen ---
If you're worried that new users won't be able to switch between HTML and
non-HTML message views (a feature, which no one uses btw) make the HTML status
bar visible by default and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Jani-Matti Hätinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Piotr Keplicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kepl...@cmc.pl
--- Comment #9
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #8 from Cristian Adam ---
The commit which removed the setting:
https://phabricator.kde.org/R94:1c55919a64491bd5598cf9d8616e77b037edbf87
In my opinion this needs to be reverted.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Jonathan Marten changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@keelhaul.me.uk
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #7 from Cristian Adam ---
The setting ("Settings > Configure Kmail > Appearance > General > Show HTML
Side Bar") has been removed in KMail 5.8.0 :(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
bugzy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzylit...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #5 from Cristian Adam ---
I have found a partial workaround – namely changing the background color of the
HTML Status Bar.
This can be done in Settings -> Configure KMail -> Appearance -> Colors. I have
used
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #4 from PK ---
Kmail is growing into a real quality application that looks good too. But now
the beautiful looks are being hit by this html-status-bar that makes a lot of
noise about (in my opinion) not so much.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #3 from Cristian Adam ---
What do you mean by "you can't to disable it as new user didn't know this
feature." ?
As a user I don't need to switch between HTML and plain-text.
I really do care about the vertical
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Laurent Montel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mon...@kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
PK changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pieterkristen...@gmail.com
91 matches
Mail list logo