https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #34 from Ilya Fedin ---
Nate, it's in 6.7.1 (not in 6.7.0!) and it's easy to get that by copying the
commit hash from gerrit and opening it on github
(https://github.com/qt/qtbase/commit/). It shows the branches and tags
the commit is on
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #33 from HE7086 ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #31)
> If someone could figure out which exact versions of Qt it landed in, that
> would be amazing. I don't know how to get that information myself.
The problem was introduced in
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #32 from pallaswept ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #31)
> If someone could figure out which exact versions of Qt it landed in, that
> would be amazing. I don't know how to get that information myself.
I'm looking at the source
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Latest Commit|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #30 from BryanLiang ---
(In reply to postix from comment #29)
> (In reply to regunakyle from comment #27)
> > Hi, since the bug is apparently fixed in upstream (...)
>
> Can you please share the link to the upstream fix?
Here is the link:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #29 from postix ---
(In reply to regunakyle from comment #27)
> Hi, since the bug is apparently fixed in upstream (...)
Can you please share the link to the upstream fix?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #28 from Ilya Fedin ---
Qt is not a part of KDE release so not right
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #27 from regunak...@protonmail.com ---
Hi, since the bug is apparently fixed in upstream, it should also be fixed in
the coming KDE 6.1 release, right?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hoffmann_lorenz@protonmail.
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||regression
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.kde.org/show_b |
|ug.cgi?id=486553
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
postix changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
postix changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #24 from Andrea Ippolito ---
(In reply to Andrea Ippolito from comment #16)
> And lastly, going back to monospaced fonts, no fallback is happening in the
> terminal panel of Dolphin.
>
> I don't know if it's a hidden Konsole instance, or a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #23 from Andrea Ippolito ---
(In reply to Andrea Ippolito from comment #14)
> Now, "second of all":
>
> some problems are clearly still visible throughout the whole Plasma UI when
> it comes to rendering emojis when the variable-width font
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #22 from Ilya Fedin ---
> It's simple to reproduce, just choose a font that doesn't come with the
> "penguin" emoji
Qt still has no real support for emojis, see here:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Fonts#Emoji_and_symbols
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #21 from Andrea Ippolito ---
(In reply to pallaswept from comment #19)
> Created attachment 168984 [details]
> Penguin works for me
What is your main font for the UI?
I was using Inter Display (og version, unpatched)
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #20 from pallaswept ---
(In reply to Andrea Ippolito from comment #13)
> First of all, I can't seem to be able to reproduce this in Konsole
interesting, what you've described is basically the opposite of OP and I. We
have failure in
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #19 from pallaswept ---
Created attachment 168984
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=168984=edit
Penguin works for me
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
Christoph Erhardt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@sicherha.de
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #18 from Andrea Ippolito ---
(In reply to Andrea Ippolito from comment #14)
> Now, "second of all":
>
> some problems are clearly still visible throughout the whole Plasma UI when
> it comes to rendering emojis when the variable-width font
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #17 from Andrea Ippolito ---
Created attachment 168551
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=168551=edit
screenshot-3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #16 from Andrea Ippolito ---
And lastly, going back to monospaced fonts, no fallback is happening in the
terminal panel of Dolphin.
I don't know if it's a hidden Konsole instance, or a different app/module, but
for sure it behaves
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #15 from Andrea Ippolito ---
Created attachment 168550
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=168550=edit
screenshot-2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #14 from Andrea Ippolito ---
Now, "second of all":
some problems are clearly still visible throughout the whole Plasma UI when it
comes to rendering emojis when the variable-width font selected does not
contain those glyphs. So again it
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #13 from Andrea Ippolito ---
I thought I'd provide some additional info since I noticed some things lately.
First of all, I can't seem to be able to reproduce this in Konsole, or at least
it's not as bad as it used to be right after
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #12 from Andrea Ippolito ---
Created attachment 168549
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=168549=edit
screenshot-1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
Timothy B changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsi.de...@gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from Timothy B
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #10 from pallaswept ---
(In reply to pallaswept from comment #9)
> seems like it may already be taken care of
Afraid not. I just looked into this and I got the update to qt 6.7 a few days
ago, and I still have this bug.
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
pallaswept changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pallasw...@proton.me
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
redhawk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crang...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from redhawk ---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
Rocket Aaron changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@rocka.me
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
Timothy B changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yule2...@live.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #7 from Guilherme Silva ---
The change introduced to fix QTBUG-110502 has been reverted:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/548651
If that change is actually responsible for this bug, then this should be fixed
in the next
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
Andrea Ippolito changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrea.i...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
Evgeny changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kurnev...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
matterhorn...@proton.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matterhorn...@proton.me
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@gentoo.org
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
Guilherme Silva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oguilhe...@protonmail.com
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #5 from Lorenzo Bettini ---
(In reply to wgalen from comment #4)
> I am also encountering this after upgrading to 6.0.1 with Arch. For now, I
> changed the fixed width font in system settings to a nerd-font patched
> FiraCode, and that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
wgalen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@waynegalen.com
--- Comment #4 from wgalen ---
I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
Lorenzo Bettini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lorebett2...@yahoo.it
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
liangrui...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liangrui...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
Ilya Fedin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fedin-ilja2...@ya.ru
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
luisbocanegra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luisbocanegra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
Bug Janitor Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||qt6
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478549
--- Comment #1 from m...@heyi7086.com ---
Additional information:
fc-match --all monospace | nl | head
1 Hack-Regular.ttf: "Hack" "Regular"
2 SymbolsNerdFontMono-Regular.ttf: "Symbols Nerd Font Mono" "Regular"
3 NotoColorEmoji.ttf:
47 matches
Mail list logo
