[krita] [Bug 452155] Some feedback about gmic

2022-04-26 Thread amyspark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452155 amyspark changed: What|Removed |Added Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/grap |

[krita] [Bug 452155] Some feedback about gmic

2022-04-26 Thread amyspark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452155 --- Comment #10 from amyspark --- Git commit 21e468f2c1426bbf7a48bba436d857adc44ba587 by L. E. Segovia. Committed on 26/04/2022 at 13:32. Pushed by lsegovia into branch 'master'. G'MIC: fix layer positioning and bounding Since this is a bug in *both*

[krita] [Bug 452155] Some feedback about gmic

2022-04-23 Thread amyspark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452155 amyspark changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/amyspark |

[krita] [Bug 452155] Some feedback about gmic

2022-04-21 Thread amyspark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452155 --- Comment #8 from amyspark --- > In other words, we don't have the right to customize the blending mode?I > remember that gmic also supports some other softwares, but "value hsv" is > unique to krita. I find it hard to imagine that they would lock "

[krita] [Bug 452155] Some feedback about gmic

2022-04-21 Thread amyspark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452155 amyspark changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||452831 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.kde.org/show_

[krita] [Bug 452155] Some feedback about gmic

2022-04-21 Thread thetwo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452155 --- Comment #7 from thetwo --- > 3. The blending mode comes from G'MIC's own specification, in this case it > tells us all three channels have the mode "alpha" (i.e. treat as normal > channel layer): I don't quite understand here. I doubt we're not t

[krita] [Bug 452155] Some feedback about gmic

2022-04-21 Thread amyspark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452155 --- Comment #6 from amyspark --- Ohh, thanks for your response! BUG1: “channels to layers” 1. and 2. stem from an issue in my plugin, I mistakenly kept the v4 mangling when getting the layer property string. That'll be fixed in my fork. 3. The blending

[krita] [Bug 452155] Some feedback about gmic

2022-04-21 Thread thetwo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452155 --- Comment #5 from thetwo --- (In reply to amyspark from comment #4) > So: > > BUG1: "channels to layers" > > 1 Trying to reproduce now, no success yet. Can you send a file with affected > layers? > 2 Fixed in > https://invent.kde.org/graphics/krita/

[krita] [Bug 452155] Some feedback about gmic

2022-04-21 Thread amyspark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452155 --- Comment #4 from amyspark --- So: BUG1: "channels to layers" 1 Trying to reproduce now, no success yet. Can you send a file with affected layers? 2 Fixed in https://invent.kde.org/graphics/krita/-/commit/37d49dc6b9144760c0d4872dda4fb61af541b6bb (ma

[krita] [Bug 452155] Some feedback about gmic

2022-04-01 Thread amyspark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452155 amyspark changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|krita-bugs-n...@kde.org |a.

[krita] [Bug 452155] Some feedback about gmic

2022-04-01 Thread thetwo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452155 --- Comment #2 from thetwo --- Created attachment 147884 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=147884&action=edit bug3 bug3 If gmic exports more than one layer, then the "undo" function will have problems. 1. The blend mode will not change to th

[krita] [Bug 452155] Some feedback about gmic

2022-04-01 Thread thetwo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452155 --- Comment #1 from thetwo --- Created attachment 147883 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=147883&action=edit bug2 bug2:“decompose channels” 1. None of the layers are in the correct position 2. The name is not standardized -- You are rece