https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383575
--- Comment #6 from Martin Flöser ---
oh yaeh sorry I mixed it up with powermanagement. Nevertheless I still think
the spec looked differently in the past.
@Nicolas: there is nothing we can do here. Our software works exactly as it
should. The bug is w
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383575
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Frattaroli ---
Guess mpv won't work right on KDE then, pat yourselves on the back for your
grand achievement.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383575
David Edmundson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@davidedmundson.co.uk
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383575
--- Comment #3 from Martin Flöser ---
We do not implement the idle-inhibit-spec. Also unlike claimed in the spec it
was not develop in collaboration with KDE. We implement the screensaver spec
which unfortuantely got deleted without any backups by gnome
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383575
--- Comment #2 from Hello71 ---
(In reply to Kai Uwe Broulik from comment #1)
> This is a violation of the Screensaver specification. If Mpv can't use DBus
> that's too bad. They could also keep a separate process running that does
> that.
Hi, thank yo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383575
Kai Uwe Broulik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@privat.broulik.de
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383575
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383575
Nicolas Frattaroli changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kdeb...@fratti.ch
--
You are receiving th
