https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #26 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Thomas Lübking from comment #25)
If you don't understand what I meant you can reread the comments. I don't want
to spend more time on this, so can we stop with this and move along please ? I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #29 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
There is already too much hate on internet and I hope that we can forget this
and make peace.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #27 from Thomas Lübking ---
ok, sorry i missed that you're just trolling. thanks for wasting my time and
welcome to my sa blacklist.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #22 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Thomas Lübking from comment #21)
OK sorry but, and I will say it only once, stop talking to me like this please.
I just hope that something more user friendly than a script will be done to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #23 from Thomas Lübking ---
Like "what"?
Telling you that your wish is "wrong" (as had been explained several times
before), asking to stop "pointless" insinuations or clarifying what denying
this wish implies and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #24 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
I don't want to argue with you. If you don't see that you talk badly to me I
can't help.
> try to not stir up my anger.
You are getting upset alone I'm afraid...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Lübking ---
This has *nothing* to do with "user friendlyness" - so stop such insinuations,
they won't get your anywhere you want.
You asked for an approach that is plain wrong (to avoid harsher
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Lübking ---
To gain less flexibility?
Despite Martins concern, the scripting overhead is neglectable - switching
fullscreen state doesn't happen that often (and far more expensive things than
a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #14 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
I really don't understand. You already do some kind of detection for the
"unredirected fullscreen window" feature...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #16 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
> What exactly is your exact concern about using the script system which was
> especially created to allow flexible and custom manipulation of the flow
> control in kwin?
I don't have any concern about
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #12 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Thomas Lübking from comment #11)
> To gain less flexibility?
Why ? Having a fullscreen matching feature built in Kwin don't avoid the
possible use of the script it one need it ?
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #10 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
What I mean is that it should be a built in feature of Kwin ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Lübking ---
Which is not part of the rule system (as your request initially pointed) and
totally broken/useless to begin with (because it doesn't cover unmanaged
windows which many games actually
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Lübking ---
Please notice that there's nothing such as a buil-in script, it's only a matter
of distribution policy.
Whether your distro installs the script with kwin, in a side package or you
fetch
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Lübking ---
That probably means we've to tell the HIG team that their efforts to stash the
compositing kcm from end users failed miserably ;-P
On the bottom line, you say "kwin has this nice and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Lübking ---
(In reply to Martin Gräßlin from comment #6)
> I'm not sure about it as it introduces string comparisons for all windows at
> all time.
If QtScript isn't totally broken: only on
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #8 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Martin Gräßlin from comment #6)
> rules on fullscreen seem wrong to me as that is kind of the dynamic
> adjustment what scripts are about. In fact the motivation seems to be about
> games and for
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #3 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
The script seems to do what I mean but it could be better to have it integrated
in Kwin don't you think since some people have gone as far as created a
specialized script ?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356557
--- Comment #5 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
I didn't know that ^_^
Great work thanks !
Obviously, you like/need this feature so do you think we can implement
something similar in Kwin ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
19 matches
Mail list logo