https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431736
--- Comment #8 from Alberto Salvia Novella ---
My opinion is this design is amateuristic, and shows low compromise with
quality.
Having to disable all composition so only specific content is not composite,
and that not being done automatically but
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431736
--- Comment #7 from Alberto Salvia Novella ---
It should be the other way around, those applications explicitly requesting not
to block composition.
You are overlooking an important issue here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431736
David Edmundson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431736
David Edmundson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431736
Alberto Salvia Novella changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431736
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||es204904...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Nate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431736
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431736
--- Comment #2 from Toadfield ---
(In reply to Nicolas Fella from comment #1)
> this can be done using window rules, albeit only on a per-application basis
What is "albeit"?
And with "per application basis",do you mean that I have to use an env var
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431736
Nicolas Fella changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicolas.fe...@gmx.de
Product|kde
