[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nilsoc...@gmail.com --- Comment #39 from Nate

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mywtf...@gmail.com --- Comment #38 from Nate

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #37 from Tobias Deiminger --- (In reply to Tobias Deiminger from comment #36) > After sleeping over it, I can't believe my own words. How could uchar* > QImageData::data happen to point to stack? Give me some time to double check > and

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #36 from Tobias Deiminger --- (In reply to Tobias Deiminger from comment #35) > PagePrivate::PixmapObject::m_pixmap were NOT in heap, but on stack. > data = 0x7fffc6093010 // Here's the large raw pixmap > //

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #35 from Tobias Deiminger --- (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #34) > That code is only used if you have QT_XCB_NATIVE_PAINTING environment > variable set that i hope you're not since it's experimental The variable wasn't set. So

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #34 from Albert Astals Cid --- (In reply to Tobias Deiminger from comment #33) > (In reply to Christoph Feck from comment #32) > > > Following this theory, I shouldn't be able to find bitmaps in heap. > > > > Your theory is wrong. Read

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #33 from Tobias Deiminger --- (In reply to Christoph Feck from comment #32) > > Following this theory, I shouldn't be able to find bitmaps in heap. > > Your theory is wrong. Read QPixmap source. I did and found

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #32 from Christoph Feck --- > Following this theory, I shouldn't be able to find bitmaps in heap. Your theory is wrong. Read QPixmap source. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #31 from Rooty --- (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #28) > I'm not going to answer further in this bug because i don't feel compelled > to have a discussion with people that saying things like "no way a 90kb PDF > can take XX Mb

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #30 from Tobias Deiminger --- (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #28) > *BUT* this may actually be a manifestation of "glibc is useless and doesn't > actually free memory when you tell it to" that i workarounded at >

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Tobias Deiminger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haxti...@posteo.de --- Comment #29 from

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #28 from Albert Astals Cid --- I'm not going to answer further in this bug because i don't feel compelled to have a discussion with people that saying things like "no way a 90kb PDF can take XX Mb of memory" as if they knew anything about

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #27 from Rooty --- (In reply to Oliver Sander from comment #26) > I am not saying that speed/memory consumption of Okular are great and cannot > be improved. However, the path from to the rather vague "Okular uses lots of > memory" to

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #26 from Oliver Sander --- I am not saying that speed/memory consumption of Okular are great and cannot be improved. However, the path from to the rather vague "Okular uses lots of memory" to specific improvements to the code is long and

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #25 from Rooty --- (In reply to Oliver Sander from comment #24) > I don't think that this would help. The argument would then be that the > "use little memory"-option has its price, which is slower loading times. > > What is needed is

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de --- Comment #24

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #23 from Rooty --- (In reply to Brennan Kinney from comment #21) > (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #20) > > Thanks for the additional information, Brennan. However, as previously > > noted, high memory usage of the sort described by

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #22 from Rooty --- (In reply to Brennan Kinney from comment #21) > (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #20) > > Thanks for the additional information, Brennan. However, as previously > > noted, high memory usage of the sort described by

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #21 from Brennan Kinney --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #20) > Thanks for the additional information, Brennan. However, as previously > noted, high memory usage of the sort described by you and others in this > ticket is not

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are receiving this mail because:

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID -- You are receiving this mail because:

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Brennan Kinney changed: What|Removed |Added Version|0.25.0 |1.4.2 Platform|Other

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Brennan Kinney changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Resolution|INVALID

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Rooty changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zy...@gmx.us --- Comment #18 from Rooty --- it's

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||looriin...@gmail.com --- Comment

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #16 from Sasha --- Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #14 from Sasha --- And some about memory leaks. I tried to move up and down thrue the ocument from side by side and after a couple of times i have about 50 additional megabites in my RAM. But couple of minutes ago the

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #13 from Sasha --- So thank you for your responding! I catched the reason of this behavior. But what will be with the program if i want to read for example 500 pages or work with some documents with lower number of

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #12 from Nate Graham --- So what are we doing with this bug? Do we consider this to be normal behavior? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #11 from Nate Graham --- Yes, I opened Okular with the document and left it open for a few hours. I didn't observe any memory leak; usage was static. So I assumed that the reporter was referring to memory consumed by

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #10 from Albert Astals Cid --- (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #9) > Question since you changed the subject of the bug, have you verified that > there is actually no memory bug? memory bug -> memory leak -- You

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #9 from Albert Astals Cid --- Question since you changed the subject of the bug, have you verified that there is actually no memory bug? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #8 from Nate Graham --- If you don't see any problems with Okular's memory usage, then go ahead and close the bug. No reason to leave it open if we don't intend to make any changes. -- You are receiving this mail

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #6 from Albert Astals Cid --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #5) > Yes, but is the amount reasonable? You have it available, do you prefer the memory to lay around being unused? > 1.17 Gb RAM / 257 pages = 4.5 Mb per

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|A very big volume of RAM|Okular uses a very large