https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281975
--- Comment #9 from Paul Floyd ---
I had a look at other platforms and PPC does something similar to handle older
and newer hardware. So perhaps it's not so bad.
I'll try to run the perf suite to compare with and without (on an RPi 5).
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281975
Markus Gothe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #167661|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281975
--- Comment #7 from Markus Gothe ---
Comment on attachment 167661
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=167661
Support for ARMv7 w/o NEON and VFP
>From 8fbd691e7f8a79983b8dbec1ee89cdf32d6b3c41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave Lerner
Date:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281975
--- Comment #6 from Markus Gothe ---
(In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #4)
> Wouldn't it be better to do this check at compile time?
The reason why we need run-time detection is that openssl and other code uses
run-time detection of VFP/NEON
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281975
--- Comment #5 from Markus Gothe ---
(In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #4)
> Wouldn't it be better to do this check at compile time?
Interesting idea... I guess it could be done, but since there already exist
dynamic detection of both VFP and NEON
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281975
Paul Floyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pjfl...@wanadoo.fr
--- Comment #4 from Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281975
Markus Gothe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
