https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461074
Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Summary|valgrind: |DWARF2 CFI reader:
|m_debuginfo/readdwarf.c:239 |unhandled DW_OP_ opcode
|6 |0x11 (consts) and DW_OP_
|(copy_convert_CfiExpr_tree) |opcode 0x92 (bregx)
|: Assertion 'srcix >= 0 && |
|srcix < VG_(sizeXA)(srcxa)' |
|failed. |
--- Comment #10 from Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> ---
Thanks, that implementation of DW_OP_bregx is almost literally the same as what
I came up with.
I also implemented DW_OP_consts, which was reported in comment #1. And
DW_OP_const8s,
DW_OP_const8u and DW_OP_constu since they are fairly similar and were also
missing.
commit 9dd5db3cb1c46c50d29bf11a495a77e2669b847a
Author: Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org>
Date: Mon Oct 2 00:37:24 2023 +0200
Implement DW_OP_{bregx,consts,const8s,const8u,constu} in dwarfexpr_to_dag
readdwarf.c (dwarfexpr_to_dag) didn't hanle various DW_OP expressions
causing Warning: DWARF2 CFI reader: unhandled DW_OP_ opcode and errors
m_debuginfo/readdwarf.c:2822 (copy_convert_CfiExpr_tree): Assertion
'srcix >= 0 && srcix < VG_(sizeXA)(srcxa)' failed.
Implement DW_OP_bregx and DW_OP_consts as reported in bug #461074.
Also add implementations for DW_OP_const8s, DW_OP_const8u and
DW_OP constu.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461074
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
