https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
--- Comment #15 from Nick Nethercote ---
The existing cache and branch simulations are very simplistic, and about 20
years out of date. I think hardware counters are a much better way of getting
cache statistics. I recently made `--cache-sim=no` the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
Paul Floyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n.netherc...@gmail.com
--- Comment #14 from Paul
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
--- Comment #13 from Ivica ---
Any new development on this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
--- Comment #12 from Ivica ---
Thanks for the reply. In that case I will let you do your thing. In case there
is any way I can help you, write me a note.
Ivica
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
--- Comment #11 from Paul Floyd ---
I've started looking at the code.
Things can be very slow with Valgrind. There are only a few of us active at the
moment. Some of us just work in our spare time and everyone else has lots of
other commitments.
No
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
--- Comment #10 from Ivica ---
Hi!
I would like to know the status of this issue. Is it simply waiting because
other higher priority stuff is pending, or something is missing in the
description of the issue or it has been silently abandoned. Please be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
--- Comment #9 from Ivica ---
Created attachment 156192
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=156192=edit
Cache conflicts log file
Hi!
As promised, attached is the cachegrind cg_annotate output on a code that has
cache conflicts. Cachegrind
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
--- Comment #8 from Paul Floyd ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #6)
> Please do make sure that all patches and reviews/comments are also added to
> this bug or at least posted to the valgrind-developers mailinglist.
Specifically, a few
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
--- Comment #7 from Ivica ---
Will do!
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 3:59 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
>
> Mark Wielaard changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@klomp.org
--- Comment #6 from Mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
--- Comment #5 from Ivica ---
I created a github mirror of valgrind, and created a patch as a Pull Request,
so it can be reviewed more easily. I sent you an invitation on GitHub for the
repository, so we can perform the review there.
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
--- Comment #4 from Paul Floyd ---
(In reply to Ivica from comment #3)
> Also, if there is some way to send the patch to an official code review
> (similar to GitHub), let me know.
Not at present. This is the place for patch submission. Review can be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
--- Comment #3 from Ivica ---
Also, if there is some way to send the patch to an official code review
(similar to GitHub), let me know.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
--- Comment #2 from Ivica ---
Ok, first, this is a proof of concept patch that I will need to fix.
The eviction emulation is NOT the default, cache emulation should remain the
default. All the existing tests will need to pass without change. I need to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465465
Paul Floyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pjfl...@wanadoo.fr
--- Comment #1 from Paul Floyd
15 matches
Mail list logo
