https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473944
Philippe Waroquiers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473944
--- Comment #4 from Paul Floyd ---
I also think that it's better to have less hard coded assumptions about the
number of PT_LOAD segments. This makes one part more flexible.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473944
Philippe Waroquiers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||philippe.waroquiers@skynet.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473944
--- Comment #2 from Paul Floyd ---
With the patch I get one regression failure
helgrind/tests/pth_destroy_cond (stderr)
There is missing source information, presumably due to a failure reading
debuginfo.
The first aspacem map is
--54635:1:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473944
--- Comment #1 from Paul Floyd ---
(In reply to Philippe Waroquiers from comment #0)
I really don't understand what linker writers are doing. First they split the
RW PT_LOAD into 2 which I thought was for performance, putting infrequently
accessed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473944
Paul Floyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pjfl...@wanadoo.fr
--
You are receiving this
