[valgrind] [Bug 481127] [PATCH] amd64: Implement VFMADD213 for Iop_MAddF32

2024-04-13 Thread Mark Wielaard
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481127 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[valgrind] [Bug 481127] [PATCH] amd64: Implement VFMADD213 for Iop_MAddF32

2024-04-13 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481127 --- Comment #11 from Paul Floyd --- For the attribution I would just put Patch contributed by Gražvydas Ignotas and Bruno Lathuilière (with the right accents if possible) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 481127] [PATCH] amd64: Implement VFMADD213 for Iop_MAddF32

2024-04-12 Thread Mark Wielaard
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481127 --- Comment #10 from Mark Wielaard --- Created attachment 168440 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=168440=edit valgrind.fma_arm64.diff This is the variant of the patch that I tested. It looks good to me. How should we credit this when

[valgrind] [Bug 481127] [PATCH] amd64: Implement VFMADD213 for Iop_MAddF32

2024-04-12 Thread Mark Wielaard
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481127 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED Ever confirmed|0

[valgrind] [Bug 481127] [PATCH] amd64: Implement VFMADD213 for Iop_MAddF32

2024-03-25 Thread Bruno Lathuilière
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481127 --- Comment #8 from Bruno Lathuilière --- The merge between the two last version is done: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/edf-hpc/verrou/bl/test_merge_fma/valgrind.fma_amd64.diff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[valgrind] [Bug 481127] [PATCH] amd64: Implement VFMADD213 for Iop_MAddF32

2024-03-25 Thread Bruno Lathuilière
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481127 --- Comment #7 from Bruno Lathuilière --- Sorry I did'nt finish my message (bad keyboard shorkey ...) I think we will need new IR to take into account vectorized fma : Iop_MAdd_F64x2, Iop_MAdd_F64x4, Iop_MAdd_F32x4, Iop_MAdd_F32x8,

[valgrind] [Bug 481127] [PATCH] amd64: Implement VFMADD213 for Iop_MAddF32

2024-03-25 Thread Bruno Lathuilière
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481127 --- Comment #6 from Bruno Lathuilière --- (In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #5) > Should we also support F16? No, there are no Iop_MAddF16 or IopMSubF16. And to my knowledge AVX512 is the only way to generate half floating-point operations. And

[valgrind] [Bug 481127] [PATCH] amd64: Implement VFMADD213 for Iop_MAddF32

2024-03-19 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481127 --- Comment #5 from Paul Floyd --- Should we also support F16? Does this also work with the other permutatons 132 and 231? Lastly, do packed and scalar make any difference? This will need a regression test as well. -- You are receiving this mail

[valgrind] [Bug 481127] [PATCH] amd64: Implement VFMADD213 for Iop_MAddF32

2024-03-18 Thread Bruno Lathuilière
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481127 --- Comment #4 from Bruno Lathuilière --- I was able to test my patch https://github.com/edf-hpc/verrou/blob/master/valgrind.fma_amd64.diff with fma4 hardware : it works. I also improve the patch of "notasas" to take into account double precision (cf

[valgrind] [Bug 481127] [PATCH] amd64: Implement VFMADD213 for Iop_MAddF32

2024-03-18 Thread Bruno Lathuilière
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481127 --- Comment #3 from Bruno Lathuilière --- Created attachment 167413 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=167413=edit Improve the previous patch to take into account double. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[valgrind] [Bug 481127] [PATCH] amd64: Implement VFMADD213 for Iop_MAddF32

2024-02-16 Thread Bruno Lathuilière
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481127 Bruno Lathuilière changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bruno.lathuili...@edf.fr --- Comment #2

[valgrind] [Bug 481127] [PATCH] amd64: Implement VFMADD213 for Iop_MAddF32

2024-02-09 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481127 Paul Floyd changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pjfl...@wanadoo.fr --- Comment #1 from Paul Floyd