[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-06-23 Thread Sam James
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@gentoo.org -- You are receiving this mail bec

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-06-22 Thread Mark Wielaard
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REPORTED

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-06-16 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 --- Comment #18 from Paul Floyd --- commit c19d19d34a6dadaf4a9d590f516f813e9cbacdd0 Author: Paul Floyd Date: Sun Jun 16 09:25:51 2024 +0200 Bug 487439 - SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug ch

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-06-10 Thread Bill Torpey
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 --- Comment #17 from Bill Torpey --- Created attachment 170348 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=170348&action=edit offending instructions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-06-10 Thread Bill Torpey
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 --- Comment #16 from Bill Torpey --- The offending instructions are not compiled - they are defined as inline asm in OpenJDK, specifically in src/hotspot/cpu/x86/stubGenerator_x86_64_log.cpp (attached). The only thing I can tell from the executable f

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-06-10 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 --- Comment #15 from Paul Floyd --- Do you have any way of telling which compiler was used to produce the binary that is generating sigill? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-06-05 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 Paul Floyd changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jsew...@acm.org |pjfl...@wanadoo.fr -- You are receiving this mail

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-05-31 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 --- Comment #14 from Paul Floyd --- (In reply to Bill Torpey from comment #13) > Been testing for the past couple days, and it appears that the patch from > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439#c10 is working fine for us -- > thanks! Good. It mi

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-05-30 Thread Bill Torpey
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 --- Comment #13 from Bill Torpey --- Been testing for the past couple days, and it appears that the patch from https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439#c10 is working fine for us -- thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching a

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-05-28 Thread Bill Torpey
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 --- Comment #12 from Bill Torpey --- Hi all -- back from the long holiday here in US. Will try suggestions and post back with results. Thanks for all the help! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-05-26 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 --- Comment #11 from Paul Floyd --- That doesn't work with clang unfortunately and I have to resort to the byte array. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-05-26 Thread Mark Wielaard
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 --- Comment #10 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #9) > diff --git a/VEX/priv/guest_amd64_toIR.c b/VEX/priv/guest_amd64_toIR.c > index f0b1c5516..28c37f092 100644 > --- a/VEX/priv/guest_amd64_toIR.c > +++ b/VEX/priv/guest_amd64

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-05-25 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 --- Comment #9 from Paul Floyd --- Bill Torpey, could you build Valgrind to test a fix? This change seems to fix your problem: diff --git a/VEX/priv/guest_amd64_toIR.c b/VEX/priv/guest_amd64_toIR.c index f0b1c5516..28c37f092 100644 --- a/VEX/priv/gues

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-05-24 Thread Mark Wielaard
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@klomp.org --- Comment #8 from Mark Wielaar

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-05-24 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 --- Comment #7 from Paul Floyd --- That's not unusual. There may be some kind of runtime instruction set selection based on hwcaps/cpuid. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-05-24 Thread Bill Torpey
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 --- Comment #6 from Bill Torpey --- The odd thing is that the SIGILL is only triggered on the X5670 CPU -- the i7-4770R does not trigger the SIGILL (exact same code, OS, etc.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-05-24 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 --- Comment #5 from Paul Floyd --- This looks like 66 48 0f 73 f1 0c rex.W psllq xmm1,0xc Some more from the log vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x66 0x48 0xF 0x73 0xF1 0xC 0x66 0xF 0x70 0xF5 vex amd64->IR: REX=1 REX.W=1 REX.R=0 REX.X=0

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-05-23 Thread Bill Torpey
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 --- Comment #4 from Bill Torpey --- Created attachment 169753 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=169753&action=edit associated hs_err_pid file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-05-23 Thread Bill Torpey
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 --- Comment #3 from Bill Torpey --- had to truncate the file (actual size ~350MB) -- hope this helps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-05-23 Thread Bill Torpey
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 Bill Torpey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wallstp...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Bill Tor

[valgrind] [Bug 487439] SIGILL in JDK11, JDK17

2024-05-23 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487439 Paul Floyd changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pjfl...@wanadoo.fr --- Comment #1 from Paul Floyd