https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385726
Glassed Silver changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glassedsil...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385726
--- Comment #9 from Glassed Silver ---
Created attachment 120774
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=120774=edit
Screenshot digikam Live Photo as two separate entries
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385726
--- Comment #8 from Glassed Silver ---
Wooops, no not 2 for each, I changed my phrasing mid-sentence and then that
happened. Sorry.
It's one entry for the image and video part each. So it shows the technically
correct two files as what
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385726
--- Comment #10 from Glassed Silver ---
Created attachment 120775
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=120775=edit
Apple Photos Live Photo View
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385726
--- Comment #12 from Glassed Silver ---
I think if we're going to implement a unified view for the JPG (or HEIF) and
movie pair we shouldn't use the regular grouping function, because then we
couldn't group multiple Live Photos without creating a messy
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385726
Glassed Silver changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385726
--- Comment #17 from Glassed Silver ---
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1PgxB3JBql7kRzOkEzhBwqKQUXtddcLAj?usp=sharing
The filesize limit doesn't allow me to include the files directly, which is a
shame, not a fan of link rot and I gotta admit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385726
--- Comment #22 from Glassed Silver ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #21)
> Thanks Ritesh. I will take a look.
>
> Gilles Caulier
Forgive me if I may come across as impatient, I am just very thankful for
finally being close t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385726
--- Comment #24 from Glassed Silver ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #23)
> yes, HEIF is supported in digiKam 7.0.0 right now, but not yet the video
> embeded.
>
> The problem is with Exiv2 which refuse to support HEIF due
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385726
--- Comment #26 from Glassed Silver ---
Thank you so much for your input.
I wasn't trying to advocate for a work-around, I was just trying to make sense
of why you're optimistic, since this seems like it could go either way over at
that project
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385726
--- Comment #28 from Glassed Silver ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #27)
> Don't be afraid. HEIF and CR3 support are popular format, and Bugzilla is
> here to remember the important entry (you can vote for this support here
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385726
--- Comment #30 from Glassed Silver ---
Just checked the release notes for 7.2 and noticed that Apple Live Photo
Support has been scheduled for 7.4, which is fantastic!
I have one question though, are competing, similar formats like Samsung's
Motion
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385726
--- Comment #35 from Glassed Silver ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #31)
> About Apple Live Photo, Samsung's Motion Photos, and Huawei's Moving
> Picture, i'm not sure where the differences are located.
>
> I'm sure that Appl
13 matches
Mail list logo
