https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445587
--- Comment #4 from Manuel Geißer ---
Created attachment 143624
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=143624=edit
Update log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445587
--- Comment #3 from Manuel Geißer ---
By the way, the purple description background is really strange. That's only on
X, not on Wayland, though. Is this on purpose, or should I file a separate
issue?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445587
--- Comment #2 from Manuel Geißer ---
Same problem on X - I have made you a screencast.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445587
--- Comment #1 from Manuel Geißer ---
Created attachment 143622
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=143622=edit
Screencast
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445587
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||regression
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445587
Bug ID: 445587
Summary: Response to mouse clicks broken
Product: kwin
Version: 5.23.3
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433071
--- Comment #23 from Manuel Geißer ---
> Present Windows effect is what is causing the issue here. Disabled it and I
> can
> see the background once again.
Wow, good catch! Disabling Present Windows indeed solves the problem.
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427913
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||geisse...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303438
--- Comment #95 from Manuel Geißer ---
> Plot twist: Plasma 5.23 is apparently a "prestige" anniversary release and
> they
> are going to chisel and polish it for further MONTHS before this fix is
> available to end users.
Wel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303438
--- Comment #93 from Manuel Geißer ---
> What do you mean? Nate said the effect is being shipped with Plasma 5.23
> though
> it "may" (which I guess is now "will") not replace it until later. Is this
> wrong?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303438
--- Comment #91 from Manuel Geißer ---
> Plot twist: Plasma 5.23 is apparently a "prestige" anniversary release and
> they
> are going to chisel and polish it for further MONTHS before this fix is
> available to end users.
Y
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442226
--- Comment #4 from Manuel Geißer ---
I think this is perhaps rather an issue with Qt(-Wayland) than with Kate
--
A question: Is it possible to deactivate completition, or dismiss the
completition history as a workaround?
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #27 from Manuel Geißer ---
Sure.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #25 from Manuel Geißer ---
Created attachment 142205
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=142205=edit
(unrelated) okular-mupdf-backend build error
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #24 from Manuel Geißer ---
So I installed the dependencies and tried to build okular-mupdf-backend (from
git master), but it fails with some "Variable not declared in this scope"
error. Also there have been no commits to the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #23 from Manuel Geißer ---
I guess you are referring to
https://invent.kde.org/sandsmark/okular-mupdf-backend ? The thing is, there are
multiple unofficial Okular MuPDF generators around...
Moreover, why is this not officially part
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #21 from Manuel Geißer ---
`grep -r mupdf` on the Okular source tree doesn't find anything, either
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #20 from Manuel Geißer ---
> There is also a muPDF backend for Okular. Did you try that?
Is this at all still current? I checked out okular from
https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular.git and built with CMake, but couldn't
find any hi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439478
--- Comment #21 from Manuel Geißer ---
Switching the compositing method does not affect the bug in any way. I already
tried that long ago...
I rather thought in the direction of a damaged configuration file issue. I've
already had that a few times
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439478
--- Comment #19 from Manuel Geißer ---
Not sure whether the driver really is the cause.
Yes, it may be possible, but I think you shouldn't rule out a cause in Plasma
or Qt without further investigation. I'd rather not consider this issue
resolved
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442900
Bug ID: 442900
Summary: [Feature request] Optional reStructuredText syntax
highlighting for inline Python documentation
Product: frameworks-syntax-highlighting
Version: 5.86.0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #19 from Manuel Geißer ---
> There is also a muPDF backend for Okular. Did you try that?
The Ubuntu Focal mupdf package currently fails to open the file
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mupdf/+bug/1943366). This likely is
fi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #18 from Manuel Geißer ---
> I think it might be better if the Okular developers would report to Poppler,
> since I never used the Poppler library interface myself and thus don't have
> the
> required background.
I now fi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #17 from Manuel Geißer ---
> I think you should report at PDFium, pdf.js, Poppler, and pikepdf.
I think it might be better if the Okular developers would report to Poppler,
since I never used the Poppler library interface myself and t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #16 from Manuel Geißer ---
> I think you should report at PDFium, pdf.js, Poppler, and pikepdf.
Be careful - there are considerable differences between these libraries. I
don't really know about pdf.js and PDFium, but pikepdf is quite
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #15 from Manuel Geißer ---
>From the referenced code we can see that Okular uses the
Poppler::Page::pageSizeF() function to obtain the page size:
https://poppler.freedesktop.org/api/qt5/classPoppler_1_1Page.h
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #13 from Manuel Geißer ---
Another possibly relevant code passage:
https://github.com/KDE/okular/blob/3a513f34b8bbba87bd96718dc96089e079578d55/generators/poppler/generator_pdf.cpp#L1303
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #12 from Manuel Geißer ---
I've searched a bit in the code, and at least the rendering proportions issue
is Okular's fault I think:
https://github.com/KDE/okular/blob/3a513f34b8bbba87bd96718dc96089e079578d55/generators/poppler
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #11 from Manuel Geißer ---
Pdfinfo from poppler-utils does not show regular units like centimetres or
inches, but it keeps the PDF points. Pdfinfo is a low-level tool that does not
perform unit conversion on its own. However, it does
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441676
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|aa...@kde.org |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #9 from Manuel Geißer ---
Sorry. I just thought you'd be the maintainer of Okular, and wondered why you
are not in the CC list, but apparently this has its reason. Sorry, really.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|aa...@kde.org |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #7 from Manuel Geißer ---
Created attachment 141456
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=141456=edit
adobe_reader
... only Adobe Reader gets the proportions right
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #6 from Manuel Geißer ---
List of other affected PDF software:
* Chromium integrated PDF viewer (uses PDFium)
* Firefox integrated PDF viewer (uses pdf.js)
* Inkscape PDF importer (uses Poppler)
* Scribus PDF importer
* PDFStitcher (uses
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Okular does not take|Okular does not take
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #5 from Manuel Geißer ---
Created attachment 141455
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=141455=edit
Proportions pdf
For you to confirm the UserUnit is set on the first page of the document in the
screenshot, but not on the ot
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #4 from Manuel Geißer ---
> the space reserved for rendering the actual page
or better formulated: the proportions of different pages to each other
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #3 from Manuel Geißer ---
To clarify, I think it is not only the displayed size number that is incorrect,
but also the space reserved for rendering the actual page:
The screenshot I just added illustrates it better: The first page is from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #2 from Manuel Geißer ---
Created attachment 141454
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=141454=edit
userunit_screenshot
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #1 from Manuel Geißer ---
Python shell code to reproduce (replace TestFiles.userunit_10 with the path
string where you saved the file, and skip the first import which depends on
custom test infrastructure of the lib I am developing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441676
--- Comment #1 from Manuel Geißer ---
Ping. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aa...@kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
Bug ID: 442280
Summary: Okular does not take /UserUnit into account (page size
incorrect)
Product: okular
Version: 21.08.1
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442226
--- Comment #2 from Manuel Geißer ---
It is "regression from earlier on wayland".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442226
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@davidedmundson.co.uk
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442226
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||regression, wayland
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442226
Bug ID: 442226
Summary: [search/replace + Wayland] Strange pop-ups instead of
a dropdown menu for completition propositions
Product: kate
Version: 21.08.1
Platform: Other
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442029
--- Comment #4 from Manuel Geißer ---
Thanks for the help! I'm rather new to KDevelop and haven't unraveled its full
capabilities yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442029
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442029
--- Comment #2 from Manuel Geißer ---
Aha, thank you!
I only searched the settings and the plugin, but overlooked the project
configuration.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442027
--- Comment #3 from Manuel Geißer ---
Thanks for the response.
Unfortunately I can't contribute to KDevelop myself, as I only know Python an
no C++. I'm currently learning PySide2 but my Qt skills are still very limited.
I also don't have the time
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442029
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||geisse...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442029
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other |Neon Packages
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442029
Bug ID: 442029
Summary: [Feature request] Add file exclude options for quick
open
Product: kdevelop
Version: 5.6.2
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442027
--- Comment #1 from Manuel Geißer ---
outside f-string*s
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442027
Bug ID: 442027
Summary: Variables inside f-strings are not highlighted and not
recognised for renaming
Product: kdev-python
Version: 5.6.2
Platform: Neon Packages
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442012
--- Comment #2 from Manuel Geißer ---
At first I was a bit puzzled by this issue because stopping syntax highlighting
first gave me the impression that there was a fault in my code.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442012
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||geisse...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Manuel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442012
Bug ID: 442012
Summary: [python3] Keywords-only enforcement using `*,` partly
breaks syntax highlighting
Product: frameworks-syntax-highlighting
Version: 5.85.0
Platform: Neon
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441312
--- Comment #27 from Manuel Geißer ---
One thing I've learned now: Before judging a software project, look at how
developers act in its bug tracker. Then you will find out whether they are
friendly or unfriendly, competent or incompetent people. Man
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441312
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|geisse...@gmail.com |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441312
--- Comment #28 from Manuel Geißer ---
> I'd be quite interested in the scorcher Martin Keary alias Tantacrul would
> give
> you if he ever tested Present Windows or Overview...
Ah, I really can't wait for that scorcher... I need to conta
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441312
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||geisse...@gmail.com
--- Comment #26 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441312
--- Comment #24 from Manuel Geißer ---
Created attachment 141270
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=141270=edit
Just in case anyone wants to enframe this conversation
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441312
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|geisse...@gmail.com |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441312
--- Comment #23 from Manuel Geißer ---
Okay, hiding my comments as spam - really?
Anyway, I think I have expressed my POV clearly and said everything that I
consider relevant. This conversations is now a waste of time. If you ever
happen to change your
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441312
--- Comment #21 from Manuel Geißer ---
Clarification to self about the Present Windows issues:
No one of ever wanted to fix them, it was all intentional. Surely devs as
capable as Nate, Vlad or David could have commented out the dimming and all
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441312
--- Comment #20 from Manuel Geißer ---
> everyone thinks they're right
Some give meaningful reasons, others don't.
> I am trying to help you be effective here.
I care about correct and comprehensible decisions, not necessarily about being
eff
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441312
--- Comment #18 from Manuel Geißer ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #14)
> 2. Thew more we argue, the less likely it is that we will agree on anything
> as we become more entrenched in our original positions.
I generally prefer good oppo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441312
--- Comment #17 from Manuel Geißer ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #14)
> Two things are clear:
>
> 1. People use this effect in different ways based on what's most comfortable
> for them; one size does not fit all.
> 2. Th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441312
--- Comment #16 from Manuel Geißer ---
Oh, so to my bad luck this mis-feature got addded. And it seems it's not even
optional.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441312
--- Comment #13 from Manuel Geißer ---
too difficult *to identify
pardon
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441312
--- Comment #12 from Manuel Geißer ---
Well, obviously I disagree very much.
> Without relatively big icons, the whole overview effect will become useless
> for me.
*With* icons it becomes useless. The purpose of an overview effect is to
q
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441673
--- Comment #13 from Manuel Geißer ---
I just installed the two packages. Works perfectly in Gwenview and Dolphin now
:)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441673
--- Comment #12 from Manuel Geißer ---
Whoah, that was quick. Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441673
--- Comment #9 from Manuel Geißer ---
What exactly are the concerns about JasPer? As of 2021, it is actively
maintained by the original author Michael Adams. There have been 8 releases
this year, and the previous week's git history is full of commits
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441673
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Add support for JPEG2000|Build
|JP2 images
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441673
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|general |Packages User Edition
Version
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341143
--- Comment #451 from Manuel Geißer ---
> LXDE works well, the communication with the developers is excellent, but the
> performance is not optimal
Probably off-topic, anyway: The performance of LXDE is brilliant, it's the
desktop environment tha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208578
--- Comment #14 from Manuel Geißer ---
To be frank, there is absolutely no need for bossing me around. I am doing a
lot of bug reporting and I know how to deal with it. All relevant information
has reached you, probably even faster than a new report
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208578
--- Comment #13 from Manuel Geißer ---
Comment 11: -1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441676
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other |Neon Packages
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441673
--- Comment #5 from Manuel Geißer ---
The Krita issue just got fixed (see
https://invent.kde.org/graphics/krita/-/commit/542dcd306e236ec776a81e389d0a601387739e48)
Maybe the cause is similar for Gwenview and Dolphin?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208578
--- Comment #10 from Manuel Geißer ---
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208578
--- Comment #8 from Manuel Geißer ---
> but maybe there is something in particular with the file
The file is valid and loads correctly with any other JP2-supporting program, so
this is unlikely.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208578
--- Comment #7 from Manuel Geißer ---
> jpeg2000 support is in krita since 4.3.0 using the library openJPEG.
I do have libopenjp2-7 installed. Does this hint at a packaging issue? (The
Krita build is from Neon User edition.)
--
You are receiv
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183903
--- Comment #4 from Manuel Geißer ---
Ok
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441673
--- Comment #4 from Manuel Geißer ---
> It works for me though on Arch Linux
If it works on Arch, then maybe we should move the issue to Neon User issues?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439480
--- Comment #3 from Manuel Geißer ---
> Can't help here, I don't use KMail myself.
Okay, thanks anyway :) Is KMail unmaintained?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208578
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441673
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |REPORTED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208578
--- Comment #4 from Manuel Geißer ---
Created attachment 141116
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=141116=edit
Opening JP2 fails
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208578
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Ever confirmed|1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441676
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aa...@kde.org
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441676
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||geisse...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441676
Bug ID: 441676
Summary: Resizing the left panel is jerky
Product: okular
Version: 21.08.0
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441675
--- Comment #3 from Manuel Geißer ---
Another workaround is to call `kcmshell5 filetypes` directly, rather than using
it in the system settings wrapper.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441675
--- Comment #2 from Manuel Geißer ---
Created attachment 141110
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=141110=edit
Buttons visible (manually extended window size)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441675
--- Comment #1 from Manuel Geißer ---
Created attachment 141109
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=141109=edit
Buttons not visible (fullscreen)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441675
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |5.22.4
CC
1 - 100 of 427 matches
Mail list logo
