[okular] [Bug 435120] Data protection: Removing or editing annotation metadata (author, date, time) should be possible

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435120 --- Comment #24 from Rainer Klute --- (In reply to 2wxsy58236r3 from comment #23) > I read [1] and I still do not understand why the timestamp is "sensitive". You can find the answer in the first two sentences of the sour

[okular] [Bug 435120] Data protection: Removing or editing annotation metadata (author, date, time) should be possible

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435120 Rainer Klute changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[okular] [Bug 435120] Data protection: Removing or editing annotation metadata (author, date, time) should be possible

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435120 Rainer Klute changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOT A BUG |--- Status|RESOLVED

[okular] [Bug 435120] Data protection: Removing or editing annotation metadata (author, date, time) should be possible

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435120 --- Comment #18 from Rainer Klute --- (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #17) You are right, the GDPR does not apply to a certain piece of software as such, but rather to a “controller”, i. e., “the natural or legal person, public authority

[okular] [Bug 435120] Data protection: Removing or editing annotation metadata (author, date, time) should be possible

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435120 --- Comment #16 from Rainer Klute --- (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #15) > I honestly don't see how GDPR applies here. Well, I do. Maybe this somehow relates to the fact that I am a certified data protection officer. --

[okular] [Bug 435120] Data protection: Removing or editing annotation metadata (author, date, time) should be possible

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435120 --- Comment #14 from Rainer Klute --- (In reply to 2wxsy58236r3 from comment #13) > I think many people use annotation tool to indicate the parts which should > be edited in the source file. So an identifier (not necessarily the real

[okular] [Bug 435120] Data protection: Removing or editing annotation metadata (author, date, time) should be possible

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435120 --- Comment #12 from Rainer Klute --- (In reply to 2wxsy58236r3 from comment #11) > Author name is personal information, but is the timestamp also considered as > personal information? According to Article 4 (1) GDPR, “‘personal data’ mea

[okular] [Bug 435120] Data protection: Removing or editing annotation metadata (author, date, time) should be possible

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435120 --- Comment #9 from Rainer Klute --- (In reply to Yuri Chornoivan from comment #4) > There are methods to batch remove all metadata: > > https://sc015020.medium.com/removing-metadata-from-pdf-files-using-exiftool- > and-qpdf-20090b75

[okular] [Bug 435120] Data protection: Removing or editing annotation metadata (author, date, time) should be possible

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435120 Rainer Klute changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOT A BUG |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Rainer Klute

[okular] [Bug 435120] Data protection: Removing or editing annotation metadata (author, date, time) should be possible

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435120 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Klute --- Albert Astals Cid, if okular is not a PDF editor, you should consider to remove the annotation capability completely and restrict it to pure viewing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all

[okular] [Bug 435120] Data protection: Removing or editing annotation metadata (author, date, time) should be possible

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435120 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Klute --- Ah, thanks, setting the author before editing is a viable way to go. Changing it afterwards on a per annotation basis might be tedious, but much better than not being able to change it at all. So I am fine

[okular] [Bug 435120] New: Data protection: Removing or editing annotation metadata (author, date, time) should be possible

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435120 Bug ID: 435120 Summary: Data protection: Removing or editing annotation metadata (author, date, time) should be possible Product: okular Version: 20.12.3 Platform: Other

[kleopatra] [Bug 407594] Cannot export secret key

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407594 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Klute --- Thanks a lot for the very quick fix! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[kleopatra] [Bug 407594] New: Cannot export secret key

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407594 Bug ID: 407594 Summary: Cannot export secret key Product: kleopatra Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: normal

[kwin] [Bug 374498] Windows get moved to second monitor when the latter is connected

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374498 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Klute <rainer.kl...@gmx.de> --- (In reply to Christoph Feck from comment #1) > Did you configure the laptop monitor as the primary monitor? Yes, I did. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watchin

[frameworks-plasma] [Bug 374498] New: Windows get moved to second monitor when the latter is connected

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374498 Bug ID: 374498 Summary: Windows get moved to second monitor when the latter is connected Product: frameworks-plasma Version: 5.8.0 Platform: openSUSE RPMs OS: