https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Latest Commit|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
Nick Cross changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@goots.org
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
--- Comment #12 from Nate Graham ---
Patch: https://phabricator.kde.org/D25293
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
--- Comment #11 from Fabian Vogt ---
(In reply to David Edmundson from comment #10)
> Is using dbus-send a universal option?
Here it's part of the same package as dbus-daemon, so probably yes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
David Edmundson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@davidedmundson.co.uk
--- Comment #10
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
--- Comment #9 from Nate Graham ---
Ah, I see. So I guess we can make this nicer in Spectacle's cmake then.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
--- Comment #8 from Fabian Vogt ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #7)
> So how do other distros handle this?
Like we do, the places where Plasma relies on "qdbus" in $PATH are patched,
like here for Fedora:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
--- Comment #7 from Nate Graham ---
So how do other distros handle this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
--- Comment #6 from Fabian Vogt ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #5)
> So maybe openSUSE should create a symlink so that referring to it as `qdbus`
> works. What do you think?
Won't work: The reason we have "qdbus-qt5" is that it does not
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
--- Comment #5 from Nate Graham ---
So maybe openSUSE should create a symlink so that referring to it as `qdbus`
works. What do you think?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
--- Comment #4 from Fabian Vogt ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #2)
> What is the canonical name of the command upstream? qdbus5 or qdbus?
IIRC neither. It's found in /usr/lib64/qt5/bin (whatever qtpaths(-qt5)
--binaries-dir returns) as
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
--- Comment #2 from Nate Graham ---
What is the canonical name of the command upstream? qdbus5 or qdbus?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
--- Comment #3 from Nate Graham ---
er, qdbus-qt5 (or whatever)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
--- Comment #1 from Fabian Vogt ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #0)
> ...But in openSUSE, it's `qdbus-qt5`.
(Nitpick) Not only on openSUSE, also on Arch (but qdbus exists for
compatibility as well) and CentOS/Fedora, maybe others.
There are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413007
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fab...@ritter-vogt.de,
|
17 matches
Mail list logo
