https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
Vincent Tassy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||time...@free.fr
--- Comment #23 from Vincent Ta
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
--- Comment #22 from Jens ---
Ricardo, I wasn't intending to (much) change the *visual* appearance of grouped
images. Just the technical way of storing them.
Right now, there are a huge heap of difficulties involved in managing grouped
images and it is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
--- Comment #21 from Ricardo Sanz ---
IMHO I don't think grouping images is so similar to subalbums. One typical use
of groups is group the RAW and the JPG file of the same image. This way you
only see one picture (the JPG probably) of your images inste
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
Ricardo Sanz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arreb...@gmail.com
--- Comment #20 from Ricardo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
--- Comment #19 from Jens ---
True - removing features must always be well thought out and there must be a
migration path (= database migration). I thought about this some more. The
concepts are indeed very similar, only little change would need to be d
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
--- Comment #18 from Wolfgang Scheffner ---
But then I can throw all my wonderful doc about grouping into the bin :-((
No, but seriously: It's for sure worth a second thought! You are right: the
differences are minim. But right now I don't have the time
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
--- Comment #17 from Jens ---
I agree to the previous points. But I have one thought I'd like to share.
We are getting to the point where "groups" of images become basically identical
to sub-albums (subfolders within an album) except for the fact that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
Wolfgang Scheffner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wscheffn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
--- Comment #15 from Mario Frank ---
Okay,
I thought about the problems for some time.
I try to resume the expected behaviour:
1) Moving a group of items should preserve the grouping relation on the moved
items (Bug description by Jens) - This works i
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
--- Comment #14 from PaulK ---
I am using MySQL on Ubuntu 16.04
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
--- Comment #13 from Maik Qualmann ---
Mario,
for testing you must remove the workaround code:
https://cgit.kde.org/digikam.git/tree/libs/database/item/imagescanner.cpp#n393
Yes, it now works with moved images within digiKam. But not with a copied gr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
--- Comment #12 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Jens,
One point : Which database type do you use ? sqlite or mariadb ?
Mario,
Problem reproducible here too (sqlite)
Gilles Caulier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Usability |AlbumsView-Group
--
You are receivin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
--- Comment #11 from Mario Frank ---
I have to correct myself. Moving the group back suddenly destroyed the group
relation... That's odd.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
--- Comment #10 from Mario Frank ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #8)
> I have for a test the workaround code removed.
>
> https://cgit.kde.org/digikam.git/tree/libs/database/item/imagescanner.
> cpp#n393
>
> But the problem with the wrongl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
--- Comment #9 from Jens ---
Is this (wrongly linked image IDs) an issue that should concern me? what
exactly happens?
Thank you :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
--- Comment #8 from Maik Qualmann ---
I have for a test the workaround code removed.
https://cgit.kde.org/digikam.git/tree/libs/database/item/imagescanner.cpp#n393
But the problem with the wrongly linked grouped image IDs is also not fixed
with the ga
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paulker...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Maik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
--- Comment #6 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
New 5.5.0 AppImage is done with garbage database collector patches.
Uploading to GDrive is under progress. It will be online in few minutes at
usual
place :
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||caulier.gil...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
--- Comment #4 from Jens ---
Oh, that is perfect. Garbage collection was on my list too - especially since
some garbage has accumulated while developing iphoto2xmp:
https://github.com/jensb/iphoto2xmp :-)
Thank you! Will try as soon as there is an appi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
Mario Frank changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.fr...@uni-potsdam.de
--- Comment #3 from Ma
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
--- Comment #2 from Jens ---
Is there no clean solution for this? AFAIK the groups only refer to the images
anyway (not the paths). so if images are moved, only the image path must be
updated. Group information in the database could stay completely unch
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||metzping...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Maik
25 matches
Mail list logo
