https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433749
2wxsy5823...@opayq.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433749
--- Comment #15 from Philippe ROUBACH ---
Today I made a cron incremental backup. I received the report by mail.
I am going to test kbackucup during one week.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433749
--- Comment #14 from Martin Koller ---
Ah you mean where you can see the output of kbackup when run from cron ?
I get the output in a mail from cron.
My crontab looks like this:
#do (incremental) system backup every day at 3:10
10 3 * * *
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433749
--- Comment #13 from Philippe ROUBACH ---
I don't want to use manually kbackup but with a cron job.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433749
--- Comment #12 from Martin Koller ---
kbackup shows all progress and problems it encounters in the right bottom area.
What do you think is not shown ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433749
--- Comment #11 from Philippe ROUBACH ---
Is there any log ? It is necessary to be alerted if there are some errors.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433749
--- Comment #9 from Martin Koller ---
To be honest I don't know. For my backup scenario kbackup is the right
solution.
Did you try to reduce the max slice size ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433749
--- Comment #10 from Philippe ROUBACH ---
I will try.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433749
Martin Koller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433749
--- Comment #6 from Philippe ROUBACH ---
>> The tar archive is 80 GB so it probably has a very large number of files
>> inside?
Yes a very large number.
consequence : several mns to access to the contents of the archive with Ark.
That's why I wish
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433749
--- Comment #8 from Philippe ROUBACH ---
>> If you want some completely different way of backing up your files, then
>> kbackup is the wrong solution.
What backup app do you advise ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433749
2wxsy5823...@opayq.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433749
--- Comment #4 from Philippe ROUBACH ---
Created attachment 136272
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=136272=edit
the answer of dolphin
See the answer of dolphin after several mns.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433749
--- Comment #3 from Philippe ROUBACH ---
Yes I can list the contents of the tar file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433749
2wxsy5823...@opayq.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433749
--- Comment #1 from Martin Koller ---
It's unclear for me if kbackup produced an incorrect tar file or not.
Can you list the content of the tar file on the command line via
tar -tvf filename.tar
?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
16 matches
Mail list logo
