https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435716
kousaki...@icloud.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kousaki...@icloud.com
--- Comment #6
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435716
Eoin O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||grum...@grum.fr
--- Comment #5 from Eoin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435716
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Savic ---
Thanks for still looking into it! ;)
If you still need a reliable test case, my offer stays open.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435716
--- Comment #3 from Eoin O'Neill ---
I'll continue to look into it.
I think the main difference is that each frame needs to be threaded separately,
if possible. That might be a rather large change with the way the flatten layer
pipeline works right
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435716
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Savic ---
Hi Eoin,
It's better but unfortunately still crawling. Where can I send you a test file
privately (it contains an animation from an upcoming movie, therefore I'm not
allowed to share it publicly, yet)? I can also
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435716
--- Comment #1 from Eoin O'Neill ---
Hi Vladimir,
There have been some changes to the transform mask on master that may have
changed this merge request. Could you check again if you have the time?
We had some recursion / infinite loop issues in the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435716
Eoin O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eoinoneill1...@gmail.com
Ever confirmed|0
