[kscreenlocker] [Bug 466178] kscreenlocker crash recovery advice doesn't make sense when there are no VTs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466178 --- Comment #2 from bluescreenaven...@gmail.com --- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/29542 is out of draft and waiting further review, but right now if you hit Ctrl+Alt+Shift+Esc with that applied org.freedesktop.login1.Manager emits the SecureAttentionKey signal, with the seat object that it was originated from, to where a display manager can react to it, and show its greeter If this gets merged, it might allow users to log in and start a second session to run the command (although it will have to be a minimal one like Weston, or one that pairs cage/foot) It might be better than guessing the VT -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kscreenlocker] [Bug 466178] kscreenlocker crash recovery advice doesn't make sense when there are no VTs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466178 fanzhuyi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b ||ug.cgi?id=473247 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kscreenlocker] [Bug 466178] kscreenlocker crash recovery advice doesn't make sense when there are no VTs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466178 --- Comment #1 from bluescreenaven...@gmail.com --- I opened https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/26313 for systemd/logind My thinking is that, logind will have to listen on the keyboard for a key binding, like a long press and hold of CTRL+SHIFT+ESC or something and when that happens, emit a dbus signal that the display manager will start the greeter, or switch to the greeter session if it is running on the seat, and then the user will be able to log in with a separate session. Maybe a minimalistic one provided by kmscon, or combining cage and foot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kscreenlocker] [Bug 466178] kscreenlocker crash recovery advice doesn't make sense when there are no VTs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466178 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED Severity|crash |minor CC||n...@kde.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Priority|NOR |VLO -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kscreenlocker] [Bug 466178] kscreenlocker crash recovery advice doesn't make sense when there are no VTs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466178 Bug Janitor Service changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |crash -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
