subject:"\[kwallet\-pam\] \[Bug 395947\] Using pam_kwallet5.so breaks pam

[kwallet-pam] [Bug 395947] Using pam_kwallet5.so breaks pam_mkhomedir.so

2018-08-02 Thread Bernard Gray

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395947 --- Comment #13 from Bernard Gray --- Thanks all :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[kwallet-pam] [Bug 395947] Using pam_kwallet5.so breaks pam_mkhomedir.so

2018-07-26 Thread Albert Astals Cid

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395947 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[kwallet-pam] [Bug 395947] Using pam_kwallet5.so breaks pam_mkhomedir.so

2018-07-11 Thread Albert Astals Cid

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395947 --- Comment #11 from Albert Astals Cid --- (In reply to David Edmundson from comment #10) > > That's why I am asking someone from the Plasma side to answer whether we > > want to backport this fixes or not. Pretty please? > > yes please. Thanks for c

[kwallet-pam] [Bug 395947] Using pam_kwallet5.so breaks pam_mkhomedir.so

2018-07-11 Thread David Edmundson

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395947 David Edmundson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@davidedmundson.co.uk --- Comment #10 fro

[kwallet-pam] [Bug 395947] Using pam_kwallet5.so breaks pam_mkhomedir.so

2018-07-10 Thread Bernard Gray

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395947 --- Comment #9 from Bernard Gray --- (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #8) > I understand your use case seems common to you, because it's your use case > to you it happens 100% of the time, but no one reported this before. I fully understand,

[kwallet-pam] [Bug 395947] Using pam_kwallet5.so breaks pam_mkhomedir.so

2018-07-10 Thread Albert Astals Cid

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395947 --- Comment #8 from Albert Astals Cid --- I understand your use case seems common to you, because it's your use case to you it happens 100% of the time, but no one reported this before. That's why I am asking someone from the Plasma side to answer whet

[kwallet-pam] [Bug 395947] Using pam_kwallet5.so breaks pam_mkhomedir.so

2018-07-02 Thread Bernard Gray

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395947 --- Comment #7 from Bernard Gray --- (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #6) > (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #5) > > It's not fixed - that commit is not in 5.12.x. > > > > @aacid: Any reason in particular it was only submitted for 5.13?

[kwallet-pam] [Bug 395947] Using pam_kwallet5.so breaks pam_mkhomedir.so

2018-07-02 Thread Albert Astals Cid

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395947 --- Comment #6 from Albert Astals Cid --- (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #5) > It's not fixed - that commit is not in 5.12.x. > > @aacid: Any reason in particular it was only submitted for 5.13? I guess i found it to be corner case-y and not wa

[kwallet-pam] [Bug 395947] Using pam_kwallet5.so breaks pam_mkhomedir.so

2018-07-01 Thread Fabian Vogt

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395947 Fabian Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[kwallet-pam] [Bug 395947] Using pam_kwallet5.so breaks pam_mkhomedir.so

2018-07-01 Thread Bernard Gray

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395947 Bernard Gray changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO

[kwallet-pam] [Bug 395947] Using pam_kwallet5.so breaks pam_mkhomedir.so

2018-07-01 Thread Bernard Gray

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395947 --- Comment #4 from Bernard Gray --- (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #3) > This should be fixed in pam_kwallet 5.13.0 - not sure why it wasn't added to > Plasma/5.12. > > Can you build pam_kwallet with > https://cgit.kde.org/kwallet-pam.git/commi

[kwallet-pam] [Bug 395947] Using pam_kwallet5.so breaks pam_mkhomedir.so

2018-06-28 Thread Fabian Vogt

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395947 Fabian Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO CC|

[kwallet-pam] [Bug 395947] Using pam_kwallet5.so breaks pam_mkhomedir.so

2018-06-27 Thread Bernard Gray

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395947 --- Comment #2 from Bernard Gray --- (In reply to Kai Uwe Broulik from comment #1) > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 392913 *** This has nothing to do with the duplicate you've marked -- You are receiving this mail because: You