https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
Bug Janitor Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|NOR |VHI
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
networkException changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@nwex.de
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
Patrick Silva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pflanzenb...@tutanota.com
--- Comment #40 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
Patrick Silva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bednarczyk.pa...@outlook.co
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
Patrick Silva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stijnvh...@gmail.com
--- Comment #38 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
Oded Arbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||o...@geek.co.il
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
--- Comment #37 from Nate Graham ---
The activation protocol was done as an extension to the core protocol. I don't
know if the core protocol itself is still open for changes. Someone who
understands Wayland better than me would have to answer that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
--- Comment #36 from Andrius Štikonas ---
(In reply to postix from comment #35)
> Just to understand the situation: Has this been built into the (core)
> Wayland protocol by now or if not, wouldn't it make sense to put it in there
> now, as of "better
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
--- Comment #35 from postix ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #32)
> It sucks, I know. I'm somewhat baffled baffled by the fact that this wasn't,
> like, built into the core Wayland protocol.
Just to understand the situation: Has this been
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
--- Comment #34 from Nate Graham ---
Indeed. :(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
--- Comment #33 from Patrick Silva ---
Thanks for clarifying Nate. Probably we will have many duplicates of this bug
in the next years.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
--- Comment #32 from Nate Graham ---
Both the sending and receiving apps need to implement activation support, or be
using a toolkit that does it automatically.
It's not enough for one of the apps to be using a compatible version of Qt6;
the other app
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
--- Comment #31 from Andrius Štikonas ---
(In reply to Patrick Silva from comment #30)
> I do not know. Which Qt version will include this fix/feature?
Probably 6.3.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
--- Comment #30 from Patrick Silva ---
I do not know. Which Qt version will include this fix/feature?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
--- Comment #29 from Andrius Štikonas ---
(In reply to Patrick Silva from comment #28)
> Strawberry music player is built against Qt 6 on Arch Linux and this bug is
> reproducible with it.
Is it using Qt6 with the patch (which I guess is Qt6 master)?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
Patrick Silva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In|6.x |Qt 6.x
--- Comment #28 from Patrick Silva ---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
postix changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||6.x
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
--- Comment #27 from Nate Graham ---
That's only in Qt6. Perhaps we should look into backporting it in our patch
collection. It's a pretty huge change though, and stretches the definition of a
bugfix. If fixing a bug required adding a major new
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
--- Comment #26 from postix ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #22)
> KDE apps won't be fixed until activation support ia added into Qt. It's
> still in progress; see
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtwayland/+/321246
It's merged, but
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
Patrick Silva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pos...@posteo.eu
--- Comment #25 from Patrick
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
Patrick Silva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egor.kuznetsov...@gmail.com
--- Comment #24
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
Patrick Silva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jebin12...@gmail.com
--- Comment #23 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |UPSTREAM
--- Comment #22 from Nate Graham ---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
--- Comment #21 from Patrick Silva ---
This bug is still reproducible on Plasma 5.23 beta even with KDE software.
1. open a text file with Kate via Dolphin
2. minimize Kate
3. open another text file with Kate via Dolphin
Result: Kate is still
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
--- Comment #20 from Nate Graham ---
So literally every app/toolkit needs to be changed to opt into the activation
protocol? I fear that this is going to feel broken forever... :(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
--- Comment #19 from David Edmundson ---
>Is this useful?
Not really.
It's only useful if the receiving software is known to have activation support.
Otherwise they need to be adjusted before we can start investigating any
potential issues on our
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
--- Comment #18 from Nate Graham ---
OK, I have begun to file bug reports on individual use case which are still
broken (for me, all of them):
Bug 442264
Bug 442265
Bug 442266
Bug 442267
Bug 442268
Bug 442269
Should I continue? Is this useful?
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
--- Comment #17 from Nate Graham ---
I haven't noticed any changes in git master here. What specific changes need to
be implemented to make it work in apps? Where should bug reports be filed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
David Edmundson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
Rainer Finke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rai...@finke.cc
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spleefe...@gmail.com
--- Comment #15 from Nate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424795
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|CONFIRMED
Summary|"Open Link" action
32 matches
Mail list logo
