https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
--- Comment #21 from Jan Rathmann ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #20)
> (In reply to Jan Rathmann from comment #17)
> >
> > My intention was to do as much testing myself and to provide as much
> > information as possible to help to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
--- Comment #20 from Albert Astals Cid ---
(In reply to Jan Rathmann from comment #17)
> (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #16)
> > (In reply to Jan Rathmann from comment #14)
> > > would it be possible that this is somehow a bug in Qt and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
--- Comment #19 from Albert Astals Cid ---
(In reply to David Hurka from comment #18)
> I don’t think there is any bug, but just that Poppler uses the available
> algorithms in e. g. the Qt painting framework, instead of complicated
> cutting-edge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
--- Comment #18 from David Hurka ---
I don’t think there is any bug, but just that Poppler uses the available
algorithms in e. g. the Qt painting framework, instead of complicated
cutting-edge alternatives which *might* perform *slightly* better.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
--- Comment #17 from Jan Rathmann ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #16)
> (In reply to Jan Rathmann from comment #14)
> > would it be possible that this is somehow a bug in Qt and not in poppler?
>
> No, please stop pretending you
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
--- Comment #16 from Albert Astals Cid ---
(In reply to Jan Rathmann from comment #14)
> would it be possible that this is somehow a bug in Qt and not in poppler?
No, please stop pretending you understand how things work better than me, the
poppler
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
--- Comment #15 from Christoph Feck ---
In qpdfview you can select the rendering engine that poppler should use (Splash
vs. Arthur), their rendering might be different. There is also a Cairo-based
engine that GTK based viewers use.
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
--- Comment #14 from Jan Rathmann ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #13)
>
> Anyhow, not an Okular bug, poppler is doing the resampling, so it needs a
> bug there https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/-/issues
I did some
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |UPSTREAM
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
--- Comment #12 from Jan Rathmann ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #10)
> This is probably related to screen sizes. Your screen is much bigger than
> mine but with the same resolution, so you get less quality than me "per
> percentage".
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
--- Comment #11 from Jan Rathmann ---
Created attachment 130657
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=130657=edit
Screenshot rendering of test.pdf with Okular (zoom level 100%)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
--- Comment #9 from Jan Rathmann ---
@Albert
Really sorry for mispelling your name, don't know how that happened...
Thanks for the screenshot, it looks indeed much bigger on 75% than on my
system! If I set zoom to 113% in Okular I get exactly the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Ever confirmed|1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
--- Comment #7 from 2wxsy5823...@opayq.com ---
@aacid
FYI:
Poppler: 0.90.1
Okular: 20.04.3
Using X11
Screen: 1080p, not hidpi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
--- Comment #6 from Jan Rathmann ---
@Alberto My screen is a 24" model with 1920x1200 resolution, I don't think
that's hidpi?
On my Kubuntu 20.04 installation the package libpoppler97 has version number
0.86.1-0ubuntu1, on KDE Neon
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aa...@kde.org
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
2wxsy5823...@opayq.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
2wxsy5823...@opayq.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
Jan Rathmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.rathm...@gmx.de
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
--- Comment #2 from Jan Rathmann ---
Created attachment 130506
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=130506=edit
Screenshot rendering of test.pdf with Okular (zoom level 75%)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
--- Comment #3 from Jan Rathmann ---
Created attachment 130507
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=130507=edit
Screenshot rendering of test.pdf with Evince (zoom level 75%)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817
--- Comment #1 from Jan Rathmann ---
Created attachment 130505
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=130505=edit
Source image file from which the test example was generated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
23 matches
Mail list logo
