https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445607
--- Comment #15 from Paul Floyd ---
Please could you move discusssion here:
https://github.com/paulfloyd/freebsd_valgrind/issues/174
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445607
--- Comment #14 from serpent7...@gmail.com ---
I attached log with debug tcmalloc version.
Is using sbrk normal? Isn't this a legacy thing?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445607
--- Comment #13 from serpent7...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 143745
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=143745=edit
Running swipl under valgrind with debug tcmalloc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445607
--- Comment #12 from serpent7...@gmail.com ---
I attached log with added --track-origins=yes
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445607
--- Comment #11 from serpent7...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 143736
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=143736=edit
Running swipl under valgrind with track-origins enabled
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445607
Paul Floyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445607
--- Comment #9 from Paul Floyd ---
Does --track-origins=yes show anything useful?
What is happening here pl_thread_idle2_va (src/pl-alloc.c:1899) ?
==59737== Thread 2 gc:
==59737== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==59737==
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445607
--- Comment #8 from serpent7...@gmail.com ---
I did a build in a jail to not mess up my system, hope this isn't an issue.
I built valgrind at f13667b1eff8d3d06590683b9981ced611bd3c69 + brk change and
debug build of swi-pl 8.2.3.
I've attached log from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445607
--- Comment #7 from serpent7...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 143711
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=143711=edit
Russing swi-pl under valgrind (with debug symbols)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445607
--- Comment #6 from Paul Floyd ---
My mistake /usr/local/lib/libtcmalloc_minimal.so.4.5.9 is google perftools
tcmalloc https://www.freshports.org/devel/google-perftools/
Try getting a debug build of swi-pl first. If there is a problem it is more
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445607
--- Comment #5 from serpent7...@gmail.com ---
OK, but how can I build debug version of jemallloc and then use it? As I
understand it, it is FreeBSD's malloc? Do I run make in
/usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/jemalloc?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445607
--- Comment #4 from Paul Floyd ---
I've pushed the change to resolve the missing syscall wrapper.
Can you clone and build Valgrind (with the diff in my previous message) and
also build debug versions of swi-pl and jemallloc?
I'll also try to get in
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445607
--- Comment #3 from Paul Floyd ---
If I increase the brk segment from 8M to 1G that part of the message goes away,
but the other parts remain.
The diff to do that is
diff --git a/coregrind/m_initimg/initimg-freebsd.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445607
--- Comment #2 from Paul Floyd ---
I've done a super quick implementation of clock_getcpuclockid2 [it probably
needs a separate i386 version because the 1st param is 64bits].
I now get
paulf> ./vg-in-place
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445607
--- Comment #1 from Paul Floyd ---
Looking at syscalls.master the missing syscall wrapper seems fairly
straightforward
247 AUE_NULLSTD {
int clock_getcpuclockid2(
id_t id,
int which,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445607
Paul Floyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jsew...@acm.org |pjfl...@wanadoo.fr
CC|
16 matches
Mail list logo
