[valgrind] [Bug 462135] vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x62 0xF2 0xFD 0x28 0x7C 0xE9 0xB1 0x2 0x62 0xF2

2024-02-24 Thread Gabriel Ravier
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462135 Gabriel Ravier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gabrav...@gmail.com -- You are receiving

[valgrind] [Bug 462135] vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x62 0xF2 0xFD 0x28 0x7C 0xE9 0xB1 0x2 0x62 0xF2

2022-11-22 Thread Stephan Mueller
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462135 --- Comment #4 from Stephan Mueller --- Am Dienstag, 22. November 2022, 19:00:15 CET schrieb Tom Hughes: Hi Tom, > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462135 > > --- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes --- > Sure, but something has chosen to output the

[valgrind] [Bug 462135] vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x62 0xF2 0xFD 0x28 0x7C 0xE9 0xB1 0x2 0x62 0xF2

2022-11-22 Thread Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462135 --- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes --- Sure, but something has chosen to output the instruction with an EVEX prefix, which was added as part of AVX512 so you'll need the AVX512 support to have any chance of decoding it. It may well be possible to encode

[valgrind] [Bug 462135] vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x62 0xF2 0xFD 0x28 0x7C 0xE9 0xB1 0x2 0x62 0xF2

2022-11-22 Thread Stephan Mueller
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462135 --- Comment #2 from Stephan Mueller --- Am Dienstag, 22. November 2022, 18:02:28 CET schrieb Tom Hughes: Hi Tom, > That's an AVX512 instruction, or at least is encoded with an EVEX prefix > which means it needs the AVX512 support to work. > This

[valgrind] [Bug 462135] vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x62 0xF2 0xFD 0x28 0x7C 0xE9 0xB1 0x2 0x62 0xF2

2022-11-22 Thread Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462135 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|REPORTED

[valgrind] [Bug 462135] vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x62 0xF2 0xFD 0x28 0x7C 0xE9 0xB1 0x2 0x62 0xF2

2022-11-22 Thread Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462135 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|unhandled instruction |vex amd64->IR: unhandled