[digikam] [Bug 123097] SCAN : ignore some directories in digiKam [patch]

2017-02-05 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123097 --- Comment #54 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Hi Gilles, ok, I will support default settings. I looked a bit deeper in the code defining the default settings for mime types. They are all directly stored in the SQLite DB in the settings

[digikam] [Bug 123097] SCAN : ignore some directories in digiKam [patch]

2017-02-05 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123097 --- Comment #56 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Yes, I agree that this is the most consistent way. But what do you mean that "DB file to use with digiKam session can be passed on CLI."? -- You are receiving this mail because:

[digikam] [Bug 123097] SCAN : ignore some directories in digiKam [patch]

2017-01-29 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123097 --- Comment #52 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Hello Gilles, I suppose, we have a misunderstanding here. My patch does not introduce new directories that get ignored by default. Even the @eaDir directory gets ignored only, when a use

[digikam] [Bug 123097] SCAN : ignore some directories in digiKam [patch]

2017-01-26 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123097 --- Comment #48 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Created attachment 103660 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=103660=edit Newest version of patch Hello Gilles, I added an info pop-up as in the mime config including the ex

[digikam] [Bug 123097] SCAN : ignore some directories in digiKam [patch]

2017-01-24 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123097 --- Comment #46 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Hello Gilles, thanks for your help and your feedback. With your hint it generally works, thats great! Now to your point regarding a default ignore list: The examples you mentioned all

[digikam] [Bug 376820] Make mime type settings GUI more consistent

2017-02-22 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376820 --- Comment #1 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Created attachment 104174 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104174=edit mime type gui AFTER -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 376820] New: Make mime type settings GUI more consistent

2017-02-22 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376820 Bug ID: 376820 Summary: Make mime type settings GUI more consistent Product: digikam Version: 5.5.0 Platform: Mint (Ubuntu based) OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED

[digikam] [Bug 376928] New: Changes on mimetypes are applied after restart

2017-02-25 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376928 Bug ID: 376928 Summary: Changes on mimetypes are applied after restart Product: digikam Version: 5.5.0 Platform: Mint (Ubuntu based) OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED

[digikam] [Bug 376820] Make mime type settings GUI more consistent

2017-02-22 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376820 --- Comment #2 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Created attachment 104175 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104175=edit patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 123097] SCAN : ignore some directories in digiKam [patch]

2017-02-15 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123097 Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #103660|0 |1 is ob

[digikam] [Bug 123097] SCAN : ignore some directories in digiKam [patch]

2016-10-26 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123097 --- Comment #26 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Created attachment 101805 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101805=edit Patch on current repository status The same problem on current status. The problem seem to be somewh

[digikam] [Bug 123097] SCAN : ignore some directories in digiKam [patch]

2016-11-10 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123097 --- Comment #31 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Created attachment 102158 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=102158=edit Update Patch IgnoreDirectories Hello Gilles, yes there are progress. The attached patch supports the

[digikam] [Bug 123097] SCAN : ignore some directories in digiKam [patch]

2016-11-23 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123097 --- Comment #35 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Hi Gilles, since my last update there is no further progress, but I hope to find time to complete the last 20% till next release. For what date in December is version 5.4 planned? -

[digikam] [Bug 123097] SCAN : ignore some directories in digiKam [patch]

2016-11-04 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123097 --- Comment #28 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Hello Gilles, thanks for your help. I will show your code the next days and complete the fix for this issue. @Note 1: Ok, I will replace tabs by blanks. @Note 2: You are right, "@eaDi

[digikam] [Bug 123097] SCAN : ignore some directories in digiKam [patch]

2016-12-08 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123097 --- Comment #37 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Hi Gilles, when changes in the new ignoredDirectories settings text field are made I trigger now a album rescan to ignore the directories. At this moment the dbEngineParameters contain the

[digikam] [Bug 123097] SCAN : ignore some directories in digiKam [patch]

2016-12-09 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123097 --- Comment #39 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Created attachment 102709 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=102709=edit New version of Patch Hi Gilles, see attached the patch. To update the paramters in CoreDbAccess

[digikam] [Bug 123097] SCAN : ignore some directories in digiKam [patch]

2016-12-12 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123097 --- Comment #40 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Created attachment 102753 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=102753=edit Patch Hi Gilles, I have attached a version without the crash caused by the wrong call of Cor

[digikam] [Bug 123097] SCAN : ignore some directories in digiKam [patch]

2016-12-15 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123097 --- Comment #41 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Hello Gilles, do you have any hint for me to update CoreDbAccess after updating dbEngineParameters? It would be great if you could help me to fix this last problem to get it work before

[digikam] [Bug 386123] New: Properties view does not include label properties

2017-10-23 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386123 Bug ID: 386123 Summary: Properties view does not include label properties Product: digikam Version: 5.8.0 Platform: Mint (Ubuntu based) OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED

[digikam] [Bug 386123] Properties view does not include label properties

2017-10-23 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386123 --- Comment #2 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Created attachment 108530 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108530=edit Video In the captions tab all label properties are correct but in the properties tab they still not appea

[digikam] [Bug 386959] Properties view: wrong creation date

2017-11-15 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386959 --- Comment #2 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Created attachment 108886 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108886=edit xmp files of the image from the screenshot The xmp file was created 3 years ago with dk 4.x and the

[digikam] [Bug 386959] Properties view: wrong creation date

2017-11-15 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386959 --- Comment #3 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- COMMENT FROM MAIL QUALMANN ON THE DIGIKAM-USERS LIST: Jan, here is the function. https://cgit.kde.org/digikam.git/tree/libs/dmetadata/metaengine_image.cpp#n534 Yes, if none of the many dat

[digikam] [Bug 386959] Properties view: wrong creation date

2017-11-15 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386959 --- Comment #1 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Created attachment 108885 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108885=edit Correct creation date with dk 4.14 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 386959] New: Properties view: wrong creation date

2017-11-15 Thread Jan Wolter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386959 Bug ID: 386959 Summary: Properties view: wrong creation date Product: digikam Version: 5.8.0 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[digikam] [Bug 357952] New: Problem with conversion from ‘int’ to ‘boolean’ when using libjpeg 9a

2016-01-13 Thread Jan Wolter via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357952 Bug ID: 357952 Summary: Problem with conversion from ‘int’ to ‘boolean’ when using libjpeg 9a Product: digikam Version: 5.0.0 Platform: Other OS: Linux

[digikam] [Bug 357952] Problem with conversion from ‘int’ to ‘boolean’ when using libjpeg 9a

2016-01-13 Thread Jan Wolter via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357952 --- Comment #1 from Jan Wolter <jan.wol...@upb.de> --- Created attachment 96627 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=96627=edit Patch for conversion problem -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 123097] SCAN : ignore some directories in digiKam [patch]

2016-07-23 Thread Jan Wolter via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123097 --- Comment #24 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Hi Gilles, at the moment I didn't tested it. But I hope I will find some time to test it with dg 5 during the next 2-3 weeks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching a

[digikam] [Bug 123097] SCAN : ignore some directories in digiKam [patch]

2016-10-25 Thread Jan Wolter via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123097 --- Comment #25 from Jan Wolter <onl...@wolter.re> --- Created attachment 101781 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=101781=edit IgnoreDirectories-Patch dk 5 Hello Gilles, I found some time to port my fix to new dk version 5. The