[Skanlite] [Bug 369433] FTBFS invalid prepsocessing directive on comments in header.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369433 gr...@kde.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gr...@kde.org Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from gr...@kde.org --- Adelie now packages 2.2.0 (https://pkg.adelielinux.org/current/skanlite) so presumably this went away somewhere. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Skanlite] [Bug 369433] FTBFS invalid prepsocessing directive on comments in header.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369433 --- Comment #4 from A. Wilcox (awilfox)--- It's the same contents as version.h.cmake and it is an in-tree build. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Skanlite] [Bug 369433] FTBFS invalid prepsocessing directive on comments in header.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369433 --- Comment #3 from Kåre Särs--- Hmm.. strange. Skanlite builds fine here on KDE Neon. There should not be a file named version.h in skanlite/src/ Can you attach the version.h file? Are you doing an in-tree or out-of-tree build? Regards, Kåre -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Skanlite] [Bug 369433] FTBFS invalid prepsocessing directive on comments in header.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369433 A. Wilcox (awilfox)changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Resolution|FIXED |--- CC||awil...@adelielinux.org Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED --- Comment #2 from A. Wilcox (awilfox) --- We're hitting this on all architectures (x86_64, x86, ppc64, ppc) trying to build Skanlite 2.0.1 from source on Adélie. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[Skanlite] [Bug 369433] FTBFS invalid prepsocessing directive on comments in header.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369433 Scarlett Clarkchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Scarlett Clark --- Seems to have fixed itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.