https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368986
Bug ID: 368986
Summary: Shouldn't the Julia back-end be an optional back-end ?
Product: cantor
Version: unspecified
Platform: Compiled Sources
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: NOR
Component: general
Assignee: fil...@kde.org
Reporter: tittiatc...@gmail.com
CC: alexanderrie...@gmail.com
Recently the Julia back-end was added to Cantor. It is good to see that new
back-ends are being developed, but shouldn't this be an optional back-end ?
At the moment during build, cmake is not even checking to see if Julia is
actually installed and the julia development files are quite different from
distro to distro.
Looking at Neon, then it seems that the Julia files are not providing any
development files, so that means that cantor can no longer be build as that it
simply fails.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Build cantor on Neon
2. Build fails as that julia/julia.h can not be found
3.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
