[kdelibs] [Bug 196303] KDE needs it's own Print Dialogue
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196303 Simon Andric changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simonandr...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kdelibs] [Bug 196303] KDE needs it's own Print Dialogue
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196303 Michael Weghorn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #18 from Michael Weghorn --- (In reply to Michael Weghorn from comment #17) > Thanks for all who have replied. > > Given that support for even/odd page selection - the one feature explicitly > mentioned in the bug report - is now present in the print dialog, I suggest > to close this as WORKSFORME and handle potential further things that may be > missing in separate reports. > > Unless anybody brings up objections, I will therefore close this bug in a > few weeks. I'm closing this now as said earlier, since no objections were brought up and the requirement initially mentioned (even/odd page selection) is now fulfilled. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kdelibs] [Bug 196303] KDE needs it's own Print Dialogue
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196303 --- Comment #17 from Michael Weghorn --- Thanks for all who have replied. Given that support for even/odd page selection - the one feature explicitly mentioned in the bug report - is now present in the print dialog, I suggest to close this as WORKSFORME and handle potential further things that may be missing in separate reports. Unless anybody brings up objections, I will therefore close this bug in a few weeks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kdelibs] [Bug 196303] KDE needs it's own Print Dialogue
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196303 Ivo Anjo changed: What|Removed |Added CC|knuck...@gmail.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kdelibs] [Bug 196303] KDE needs it's own Print Dialogue
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196303 Matthias Heinz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.he...@gmx.net --- Comment #16 from Matthias Heinz --- Hello alltogether, the printing dialog right now does its job. It's ok. But afair the old dialog had more features. But it's not that I'm missing much. Back in 2009 I did some manual duplex printing, which was annoying, but can be pretty easy with a good gui. Now almost every printer has a duplex unit built in, so it doesn't matter anymore. Also I don't print much anymore, too. Paper got somewhat obsolete for me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kdelibs] [Bug 196303] KDE needs it's own Print Dialogue
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196303 --- Comment #15 from Michael Schmuker --- (In reply to Michael Weghorn from comment #14) > > I agree. > > There have recently been several improvements in the Qt print dialog > (currently in Qt's development branch) and I think it would be helpful to > know what exactly is currently still missing or bad, so that actual > improvement can be made. (Depending on clear requirements, it can then be > decided what the best way to implement this would be and what the right > place to address those is...) There have been no new replies on this thread for six years... Maybe this is enough evidence that the need for a proper printing dialog does not exist anymore. I, for one, can confirm that I neither print a whole lot anymore (but "print to PDF" instead). More importantly, I switched to another operating system, so I can't even comment on the improvements in the Qt print dialogue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kdelibs] [Bug 196303] KDE needs it's own Print Dialogue
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196303 Joe changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jose...@main.nc.us | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[kdelibs] [Bug 196303] KDE needs it's own Print Dialogue
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196303 Michael Weghorn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de --- Comment #14 from Michael Weghorn --- (In reply to Facundo Aguilera from comment #8) > I suggest to close this bug and then report one bug per feature wich is > wanted. For example, I only needed odd/even printing and this is now > implemented. I agree. There have recently been several improvements in the Qt print dialog (currently in Qt's development branch) and I think it would be helpful to know what exactly is currently still missing or bad, so that actual improvement can be made. (Depending on clear requirements, it can then be decided what the best way to implement this would be and what the right place to address those is...) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
