[kwin] [Bug 376507] Moving window between virtual desktops doesn't raise them

2017-02-16 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376507

pfannenwen...@googlemail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|INVALID |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from pfannenwen...@googlemail.com ---
I will look into that.
Thanks for the feedback!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[kwin] [Bug 376507] Moving window between virtual desktops doesn't raise them

2017-02-15 Thread Martin Gräßlin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376507

Martin Gräßlin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|FIXED   |INVALID

--- Comment #3 from Martin Gräßlin  ---
If we change it we get bug reports about it now raising the window.

What you can do is using a KWin script to raise a window when switching
desktops.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[kwin] [Bug 376507] Moving window between virtual desktops doesn't raise them

2017-02-15 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376507

pfannenwen...@googlemail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|INVALID |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from pfannenwen...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to Martin Gräßlin from comment #1)
> The behavior seems correct to me. The stacking order includes all desktops
> and the opening of application b gets it raised above application a. Thus
> the stacking order looks correct to me.

If you put it like this it seems coherent, but very counterintuitive.
This behaviour results in having to use alt+tab twice to actually have the
application visible when you switch it over to another desktop. Is there any
hope that this could be changed, or do you feel that the current behaviour is
favourable?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[kwin] [Bug 376507] Moving window between virtual desktops doesn't raise them

2017-02-15 Thread Martin Gräßlin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376507

Martin Gräßlin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Martin Gräßlin  ---
The behavior seems correct to me. The stacking order includes all desktops and
the opening of application b gets it raised above application a. Thus the
stacking order looks correct to me.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.