https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #34 from buzzurro ---
It works perfectly, thanks! Neon latest version OK.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #33 from Jack Prom ---
I think, I speak for all of us: thank you <3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
Latest Commit|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #31 from faunris ---
(In reply to Jack Prom from comment #30)
> > Just reverting the patches is going to be
> > another big visual change that might annoy someone else who will ask to
> > change it again. See the picture?
>
> I don't unders
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #30 from Jack Prom ---
> Just reverting the patches is going to be
> another big visual change that might annoy someone else who will ask to
> change it again. See the picture?
I don't understand the logic behind this oppinion. The point to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
Simon Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simonandr...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #29 from Jan Grulich ---
Here is the link to the mailing list where I asked:
https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-hardware-devel/2017-August/003878.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #28 from buzzurro ---
Any news? Working with nmtui is a nightmare!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #27 from faunris ---
(In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #20)
> Back to the problem, I'll try to bring this back to discussion and we will
> see if we are
> going to revert the removed support back or not.
Please post here a discussion
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #26 from Stefan Schmid ---
(In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #23)
> The code is still there, those connections are just filtered and not shown
> in the main UI.
"remove code from upstream" and "filtering" are not the same!
On Gentoo is t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #25 from Jack Prom ---
(In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #20)
> We removed it because for 99% of users this is useless
99% based on which statistic? ;)
> may just confuse/scare people who know
> nothing about those certain connections
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #24 from Meconio ---
Yes but the user now is unable to use advanced network features talked above
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #23 from Jan Grulich ---
(In reply to Stefan Schmid from comment #22)
> (In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #20)
> > We removed it because for 99% of users this is useless and may just
> > confuse/scare people who know nothing about those
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #22 from Stefan Schmid ---
(In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #20)
> We removed it because for 99% of users this is useless and may just
> confuse/scare people who know nothing about those certain connections.
But this is no reason to c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #21 from Meconio ---
Then I suggest a package to install separately for adding all of this functions
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #20 from Jan Grulich ---
Hi,
I'm aware that some of you may be unhappy with the change we did and sorry for
not responding earlier, I had some personal stuff to do. Back to the problem,
I'll try to bring this back to discussion and we will
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #19 from Meconio ---
Thanks Jack for your support. I agree with what you have said I would just add
that they are not only 9 people to whom this arbitrary decision has created
problems. I'm talking about the technical department of our compa
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
Bob Wya changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bob.mt@gmail.com
--- Comment #18 from Bob Wya --
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
Jack Prom changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@protohuman.net
--- Comment #16 from Jack Prom
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #17 from Jack Prom ---
ok, have a look:
1. Gnome drops support cause "supported by Cockpit already"
2. You ask on kde-hardware-devel about dropping too. One persons says yes,
another no: 2:1 - in my opinion this isn't "we decided"!
3. you d
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
buzzurro changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eur0nym...@hotmail.it
--- Comment #15 from buzzurro
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #14 from Stefan Schmid ---
To force the people to a NetworkManager but then only pass the half of the
functionality is just bad design. If you do not want to have a VLAN, Bridges or
whatever, then the NetworkManager is not the right choice.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #13 from vetas...@gmail.com ---
Make KDE NM great again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
Richard Hering changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rich...@internethering.de
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
Stefan Schmid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schmidi...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #11 from Jan Grulich ---
*** Bug 382024 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
faunris changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||faun...@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from faunris ---
I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
rakar...@yahoo.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rakar...@yahoo.it
--- Comment #9 from rakar.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
Smallker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #8 from Smallker ---
*** This bug has
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
Meconio changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meconiot...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Meconio --
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #6 from Jan Grulich ---
Here are commits I found related to that, but I'm not sure whether this is all
and I cannot guarantee that reverting those will not break something.
-
https://cgit.kde.org/plasma-nm.git/commit/?id=aae4b7886bcf865d976
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #5 from imraro ---
I've read. Is sad, when the familiar functionality worked for several years is
lost and you need to rebuild the workflow. Can you point to the commit for
applet, because i want to revert it for my build?
--
You are recei
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #4 from Jan Grulich ---
If you want more info why we decided to go this way check:
https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-hardware-devel/2015-December/003573.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
--- Comment #3 from imraro ---
Even you don't want support ability to create this type of connections, why not
leave the opportunity to connect through an applet to already created
connections?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||imr...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Jan Grulich
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376664
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgrul...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Jan Gruli
37 matches
Mail list logo